Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces an ‘important and blessed phenomenon,’ Khamenei says

Iraqi Prime Minister Hayder al Abadi arrived in Tehran today to meet with senior Iranian government officials. Among them was Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who has the final word on all Iranian foreign policy matters. Abadi’s trip follows a meeting with Saudi officials in Riyadh, and he is slated to visit Kuwait. While Iranian and Iraqi officials vowed to boost ties and trade, Khamenei also emphasized that he intends to bolster Tehran’s presence in the Iraqi state via proxies.

Khamenei told Abadi that he wants the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) – a conglomeration of Iraqi militias that was enshrined as an official part of the Iraqi state last year – to remain in Iraq. There has been some discussion about whether the PMF would dissolve following the Mosul campaign. Figures backed by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) hold key positions and are the dominant formations in the PMF.

The PMF is an “important and blessed phenomenon,” Khamenei stressed. “The reason the Americans oppose the popular forces is because they want Iraq to lose its important factor of strength,” he told Abadi.

The Iranian Supreme Leader praised the PMF as a “great wealth” during a meeting with national alliance leader Ammar al Hakim last year. In a meeting with Abadi in 2015, Khamenei also lauded the PMF, claiming it has “great potential” for “the future of progress of Iraq in different arenas.” By this, Khamenei likely meant that he wanted to see the PMF serve a more expansive role in the state.

The PMF formed in 2014 following Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani’s fatwa to drive the Islamic State from Iraq (though Sistani later clarified that he intended to strengthen Iraqi security forces, not legitimize paramilitary groups). IRGC commanders were influential in the formation of the PMF and still have great influence within it. IRGC operatives have been embedded in the PMF, including during the Mosul campaign.

The Iraqi prime minister is not inclined to abide by Khamenei’s call to reduce America’s presence in Iraq. The supreme leader called on Abadi not to “trust the Americans” and said he should not permit the US troop presence in Iraq. Khamenei wants to diminish or eliminate US influence in Iraq and for Abadi to move farther away from his Western ally. Earlier in the year, however, Abadi secured US assurance of continued support.

Khamenei also praised the arrival of Iraqi forces near the Syrian border, calling it “a strategic and big move.” IRGC-backed forces are attempting to maximize gains and link fighters in the Syrian-Iraqi border area. This route would facilitate the movement of manpower and material between Iran and the Levant after a nearly six-year break. It would also back up Iran’s air bridge. The effort to secure the route, however, faces significant obstacles, including US military actions and an area laden with hostile insurgents.

Khamenei, as well as President Hassan Rouhani, have voiced their support for Iraq’s territorial integrity and opposition to a Kurdish referendum. Khamenei was quite explicit in this regard.

Abadi wants to keep good ties with Iran, Saudi Arabia and the US and avoid an escalation of the Iranian-Saudi proxy war into Iraq. A published readout did not include Abadi’s comments on the PMF. But he did thank Khamenei for Iran’s support during the war with the Islamic State, saying “we need the Islamic Republic’s support during the post-DAESH [Islamic State] stage that is the stage of stability and peace and construction.” This reflects Abadi’s goal to keep Iraq stable for reconstruction and control violence. According to Reuters, Abadi recently criticized the IRGC-controlled elements of the PMF that kidnapped Qatari royals as part of a multi-million dollar ransom scheme. But he has been unable to rein them in.

Today’s meeting highlights the continued hostility of Khamenei toward the US and his goal to assert Tehran’s presence in Iraq using the vehicle of the PMF. Many Guard-backed elements seek to translate their military successes into political influence as Iraq faces city council and parliamentary elections tentatively scheduled in the next year. Abadi is in the unenviable position of overseeing Iraq post-Mosul, balancing between competing powers as he faces elections and the Kurdish referendum vote.

Amir Toumaj is a independent analyst and contributor to FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags: , , , , , , ,


  • Robert says:

    Hayder, you with the stars in your eyes….. Anyroad, this is what the regional powers must do on their own. Work strategies out, political, military , as well as economically. A fine balance for all to agree with.

  • den says:

    This is the real ‘knife in the back’ . After everything we’ve done to kill Isis, this traitorous member of the asswipa tribe goes to Iran and kisses the ayatollahs feet and butt. This reads volumes about America’s future there. Talk about some things not paying off. ! What is the point? Maybe we should have waited till Isis was at Tehran’s doorstep and then said, ‘Well,..I don’t know..maybe.’

  • Frank Dunn says:

    Will Iraq divide into 2 regions, Shia and Kurds? The destruction of primarily Sunni cities such as Mosul is surely driving Sunni refugees into US/UN tent cities until the defeat of ISIS. But then what? Will the Iranian militia and weak Iraqi central government allow the Sunnis to return? Who will pay for the massive rebuilding of these cities? Or, will this displaced population head to Europe, the U.K. and the US?

    Which leads to, will the US military have to garrison the Sunni region while protecting the Kurds and Yazida from attacks by the Iranian militia? Worse, will the US have to garrison most of Iraq to keep Iran from swallowing up the country? Does it matter if Iran builds its Persian empire of Iraq and Syria? Finally, will we have to station troops in the non-Assad controlled areas of Syria to protect the residents while funding the rebuilding of Aleppo and other cities that dissolved in civil and uncivil wars since 2012?

    This region is a nightmare with no foreseeable awakening.

  • TRM says:

    “Important and blessed”– Especially the ones Iran controls, no doubt…

  • tuffsnotenuff says:

    So, finally, ISIS has all but destroyed Sunni Iraq. Aerials of Mosul show mile after mile of wreckage. Public buildings at Ramadi aren’t much better off, same for Fallujah.

    The GCC states that financed ISIS are unlikely to contribute more than token sums to rebuild Iraq’s Sunni and mixed-Sunni cities. They don’t give a damn.

    Yet you still see comments such as above from “den” that miss what is important. All of what is important.


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram