Observations on Taliban video ‘welcoming’ rogue ANA soldiers


On Aug. 7, 2012, the Taliban’s media council released a 34-minute video on their Voice of Jihad website, titled “Ghazi of Ghaziabad,” a disjointed montage of interviews and footage showing Taliban commanders in eastern Kunar province separately ‘welcoming’ two Afghan National Army (ANA) soldiers suspected of killing US and Afghan soldiers in green-on-blue attacks earlier this year. The term “ghazi” refers to an individual who has had success in his or her struggle against non-believers or ‘infidels.’

The video features interviews with two rogue ANA soldiers — “Ghazi” Mahmood from Gereshk district in Helmand province, and “Ghazi” Khan Mohammad, a Dari-speaking Afghan purportedly from northern Takhar province. The video concludes with a previously recorded interview with another rogue ANA soldier, “Ghazi” Mohammad Rozi, who shot and injured three Australian soldiers and two Afghan soldiers on Nov. 8, 2011 at a small patrol base known as Nasir in central Uruzgan province. Mohammad Rozi, like Khan Mohammad, allegedly comes from Takhar.

The Aug. 7 video shows Mahmood being greeted by local elders and suspected Taliban fighters who shower him with praise for killing his Coalition mentors. The Taliban shadow district governor for the Ghaziabad district, Mawlawi Abdul Jalal, whom he sits next to during the recorded interview, is also among those who greet Mahmood as he enters a remote village in Ghaziabad.


According to Taliban math, Mahmood gunned down “a dozen American troops” at the camp on May 11, but NATO confirmed Mahmood had killed one US soldier and wounded two others before he fled into the mountains of Ghaziabad, as reported in the New York Times. Mahmood served as a gate guard at a small ANA outpost in Ghaziabad near an area known as “Bagran,” which is said to be located between Ghaziabad and Asmar districts, not far from Kunar’s shared boundary with Nuristan.

The video also chronicles a second rogue ANA soldier named Khan Mohammad, purportedly from Takhar province, who took credit for killing an ANA commander and two other ANA soldiers at the “Barfani check post” in the “Sarkano” (Sarkanay) district of Kunar province. The video shows Khan Mohammad meeting with several Taliban commanders, including one whose face remains obscured by Taliban video editors, while another unidentified commander can be seen in several instances carrying a US M-4 carbine.

Khan Mohammad claims he turned his weapon against his commander and other Afghan soldiers because they were “drinking alcohol” and “not praying.” As in the footage with Mahmood, local elders and suspected Taliban fighters can be seen praising and stringing necklaces laced with flowers over the neck of the ‘hero.’

In neither Mahmood’s nor Khan Mohamad’s case is there a sense that they were Taliban ‘sleeper agents’ or infiltrators who penetrated the Afghan National Security Forces to carry out such attacks. Rather it appears that both men reacted to their environment and situations on a personal level, and were ‘welcomed’ by the Taliban following their actions.


Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: , ,


  • Stephen Ryan says:

    When we catch these guys how effective it would it be if we just took them for a helicopter ride and dumped them out over their home grounds. This approach would not, nor could not, make their likes more vicious. It would just show them they we mean business and that we know what they are.

  • Mr T says:

    I kill you if you do not pray. That’s the enemy we are fighting. Murderers who kill whenever they see something they don’t like. I wouldn’t want to be associated with people like that. The Taliban are really sick people.

  • AJ says:

    The m4 the muhj is holding is not a weapon given to the ANA or ANP, attached on the weapon’s rail is an IR laser designator and on top a small optic is mounted, hard to tell if it’s an Holo type Eotech or perhaps an Aimpoint, none of which are supposed to be given to non US personnel per DOD rules. That could be a potentially telling clue, night vision devices are necessary to see the IR laser meaning they may have NVD’s. I know from open source materials some first-gen NVD’s have been found on fighters, and even some US MILSPEC NVG’s stolen from US forces in rare instances. Also, since it’s chambered differently from the ubiquitous AK variants the muhj favor, they must be getting at least minimal support from some of our supposed “allies” that we give military aid, including the m16/4 rifles, ammo, SF trainers etc. Anyone else have any thoughts on that>


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram