Slain Syrian official supported al Qaeda in Iraq

On July 18, a bomb killed at least three top officials from Bashar al Assad’s crumbling regime. Among them was Assef Shawkat, the deputy defense minister and former head of Syrian military intelligence. Different accounts of how Shawkat and the others were killed have been offered to the media. Either a suicide bomber or a remotely detonated explosive device did them in. In either case, it was a remarkable turn of events–a boomerang of sorts. For years, Shawkat and his fellow Assad family cronies directed this sort of attack at others, particularly American soldiers in Iraq.

Leaked State Department cables show that Shawkat was one of al Qaeda in Iraq’s (AQI) most important patrons. And he played this role on behalf of his brother-in-law, Bashar al Assad.

Syrian regime sponsored al Qaeda network run by Abu Ghadiyah

In late October 2008, the US military launched a daring commando raid inside Syria, just several miles from the Iraqi border. The target was a top al Qaeda facilitator known as Abu Ghadiyah. Earlier that same year, the US Treasury Department designated Ghadiyah, a native Iraqi, and three of his family members as major al Qaeda players. They ran a pipeline in Syria for foreign fighters and suicide bombers traveling to Iraq.

Ghadiyah was appointed as the head of this Syrian-based network in 2004 by Abu Musab al Zarqawi, the notorious overall leader of AQI until his demise in 2006. After Zarqawi’s demise, Ghadiyah went to work for the new head of AQI, Abu Ayyub al Masri, who was also subsequently killed in 2010. Both Zarqawi and al Masri set up shop inside Iraq prior to the March 2003 US-led invasion.

The Abu Ghadiyah network was responsible for much of the carnage that followed Saddam Hussein’s ouster. A July 11, 2008 cable from the US embassy in Baghdad describes the network as the “principal conduit for foreign terrorists heading into Iraq to join AQI.” The cable reads: “This network continues to operate with the knowledge of the Syrian government and sends virtually all of its foreign terrorists into Iraq across the Syrian border.”

It is easy to see why the US military was keen to disrupt Ghadiyah’s network. The number of foreign fighters and suicide bombers who were shuttled into Iraq through this Syrian-based hub numbers easily in the hundreds.

Before Abu Ghadiyah was killed, General David Petraeus and other US officials visited Syria’s neighbors in an attempt to put pressure on Assad to give up his support for AQI. Their efforts were fruitless. Thus, the US military decided to take matters into its own hands and executed the unprecedented raid on al Qaeda inside Syria in October 2008.

But even after the decapitation strike on Abu Ghadiyah’s compound, the network remained a problem.

During a Dec. 26, 2008 meeting with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki, according to one leaked State Department cable, General Petraeus explained “that the Syrians are playing a dangerous double game” with respect to the Iraqi insurgency. The cable summarizes Petraeus’s comments further: “While professing commitment to security cooperation, [the Syrians] turn a blind eye to AQI terrorist facilitation activity and they aid and abet Iran’s interference in Lebanon, Gaza, the West Bank, and elsewhere.”

Petraeus pointed the finger of blame directly at Assad and Shawqat, who knew full well what al Qaeda was up to on Syrian soil. The State Department’s cable reads [emphasis added]:

Bashar al-Asad was well aware that his brother-in-law ‘Asif Shawqat, Director of Syrian Military Intelligence, had detailed knowledge of the activities of AQI facilitator Abu Ghadiya, who was using Syrian territory to bring foreign fighters and suicide bombers into Iraq. Both Lebanese President Michel Sulayman and Jordan’s Director of General Intelligence had warned Al-Asad and his GID Director, respectively, that the U.S. knew about these activities and urged him to take action, but their warnings were unheeded, Gen. Petraeus noted.

Petraeus sounded a similar theme earlier that same month, on Dec. 2, 2008, when he met with Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) Commander Jean Kahwagi. “We know for a fact that Syrian Military Intelligence Director Asif Shawka[t] is aware of this issue, as is President Assad,” Petraeus is quoted as saying. Petraeus was referring directly to the issue of “foreign fighters,” — that is, al Qaeda fighters – entering Iraq from Syria.

Petraeus continued to press the problem of Syria’s sponsorship of AQI with senior Italian leaders, including Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, one week later. A cable summarizing the Dec. 9-10 meeting reads:

Petraeus noted Syrian officials were well aware of the activities of Al Qaeda for [sic] foreign fighter facilitators on their soil and added that the 90 percent drop in the numbers of fighters and suicide bombers entering Iraq was thanks to actions by governments in North Africa and the Region, and was not due primarily to any Syrian efforts.

Months later, in July 2009, Petraeus met with Lebanon’s top officials, including Prime Minister Fouad Siniora and President Michel Sleiman. Two leaked cables summarize those meetings. In one, Petraeus credits the Syrian regime with being “somewhat more helpful than in the past stemming the flow of foreign fighters into Iraq” and said that “the number of such fighters entering Iraq from Syria had decreased.” The cable adds [emphasis added]:

However, the problem continues: not only do foreign fighters and suicide bombers continue to come into Iraq from Syria, but the Syrian regime allows foreign fighter facilitator cadres to base themselves in Syrian territory, Petraeus said. In time, these fighters will turn on their Syrian hosts and begin conducting attacks against Bashar al-Asad’s regime itself, Petraeus predicted.

Another cable from late 2008 relays the same warning from Petraeus:

Ghadiyah’s successors, [Petraeus] noted, were already getting established. He added that the Syrian regime should be very concerned about such deals with extremists, citing the situation the Pakistani government currently faced with extremists they had condoned.

Petraeus’s prediction proved to be prescient. AQI has joined other al Qaeda-affiliated parties in the rebellion and is targeting Assad’s regime. The years-long assistance provided by Assad, Shawqat and other Syrian officials did not earn the terror network’s loyalty.

Coordination with other terrorist groups

In 2006, the Treasury Department designated Shawkat as a terrorist supporter, noting that he coordinated the activities of several terrorist groups: Hezbollah, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine-General Command (PFLP-GC), Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ).

Hezbollah is, of course, a Lebanese Shiite terrorist organization that has long served as a proxy for both Syria and Iran. Hamas and PIJ are radical Sunni terrorist organizations. Despite their ideological differences, Shawkat “discussed coordination and cooperation between the terrorist groups” with leaders from each of them. And each of these groups enjoyed safe haven inside Assad’s Syria.

Shawkat also played a personal role in fomenting anti-Israeli terrorism, according to the Treasury Dept. As the deputy director of Syrian Military Intelligence, Shawkat “helped direct operations against Israel, some of which were coordinated with Palestinian terrorist group leaders, including PFLP-GC leader Ahmad Jibril and PIJ leader Ramadan Shallah.”

And in 1997, the Treasury Dept. found, Shawkat “instructed PIJ Secretary General Ramadan Shallah to surveil strategic targets in a neighboring country to prepare for possible future attacks.”


It is not known who, exactly, was responsible for the bomb that killed Shawkat and his Syrian compatriots. In the wake of the attack, two groups claimed responsibility.

Regardless of which group is responsible for the bombing, al Qaeda and affiliated groups have expanded their operations inside Syria and joined the fight against the Assad regime. For years, AQI used Syrian soil to launch operations inside Iraq. And now the terrorist organization has found a new set of targets.

Thomas Joscelyn is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Senior Editor for FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags: , , , ,


  • Rookie says:

    Assad supported AQI and now he gets what he deserves.
    Now US, France and UK use AQ in their drive to topple secular (even if dictatorships) regimes in Libya, Egypt and Syria. I guess Saudi money can buy anything, even entire governments and military top brass.
    Guess who will be the next target, again?
    The predictions are so easy to be made: millions of Christians will be slaughtered in Egypt and Syria, exactly as it happened in Iraq. Not many articles on the fate of those millions killed or forced to flee, while the local American brass was enjoying a lamb meal with shia murderers in Basra.
    Those countries becoming 99.9999% “pure”, AQ can concentrate on the main goal, the Europe and US.
    Siding with blood thirsty murderers to topple blood thirsty murderers does not end well. Basically vast areas of ME and Africa are under islamic fundamentalist control in less than 3 years.

  • AJH says:

    He who lives by the sword dies by the sword.

  • david says:

    Lie down with dogs, wake up with fleas…

  • Tony Buzan says:

    Points well taken Rookie.
    Why fork over BILLIONS in oil and weapons to a nation (Saudi Arabia) that has BANNED possession of the New Testament.
    That sucks. That pisses me off.
    Russia or Iran never did that.
    And yet the Saudis get all our money and we do their dirty work first getting rid of Saddam and now invading Iran next year.

  • Steve M says:

    I am afraid that Rookie’s comment is very close to the truth! What are we doing and who are we doing it for?

  • Zeissa says:

    Red on red is always fun, and is indicative of a weak enemy… like OUR OWN green on blue.
    If you can’t manage your own Empire or ideological groups, defeat awaits. It’s a tie in this area.
    Well, we’ll win overall, but overall the West weakens and the East rises with the giveaway of tech. I’m half-Asian so I don’t mind, except soon we’ll have to pay police costs. ; )

  • Emory says:

    “In time, these fighters will turn on their Syrian hosts and begin conducting attacks against Bashar al-Asad’s regime itself, Petraeus predicted.”
    Amazing precience by Petraeus. It only took about 4 years.

  • HJM says:

    Damn some folks never learn. Syria didn’t have to look any further then Pakistan to see what would happen to them making deals with AQ types. I’d stay far away from the Syria situation with the exception of “Tier 1 Types” on the ground reporting what’s going on. America needs to learn the same lesson here. Arming the resistance is arming religious fundamentalist and how’s that working out in Libya and Egypt? Let them destroy themselves if that’s their pleasure.

  • sundoesntrise says:

    All empires and civilizations rise and fall, history is proof of that.
    But being half Asian does not matter. Like the rest of history, old empires will rise and new ones fall – and just like the past, the new empires will exist only to benefit the ruling class and those who serve the ruling class. Being half Asian will get you nowhere.
    Besides, how do you know we’ll “win” anyway? That is an awfully bold assumption to make. We face a much more determined enemy than us, if it weren’t for technology, we might even be on the losing side, especially due to the harsh terrain.

  • DjOsiris says:

    The US is being hipocritical as usual by hunting Al Qaeda in some countries yet supporting the same terrorists in others like Syria and Libya! I have written several articles regarding US support for Al Qaeda in both Syria & Libya on my blog::


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram