2 ISAF troops wounded in yet another green-on-blue attack

A member of the Afghan National Security Forces has yet again targeted Coalition personnel. From the ISAF press release:

An Afghan National Army soldier turned his weapon against International Security Assistance Force service members in northern Afghanistan today. ISAF troops returned fire killing the shooter. There were no ISAF fatalities. Afghan and coalition officials are investigating the incident.

ISAF did not say if any troops were wounded, but the deputy governor of Faryab province, where the attack took place, said that two US soldiers were wounded in today’s attack, which took place on a base, according to AFP.

Today’s attack took place just one day after another member of the ANSF killed three Coalition military advisers in Herat province. Yesterday’s attack was technically not a green-on-blue attack (where a member of the Afghan security forces kills or wounds an ISAF soldier), but is part of a growing and worrying trend of Afghan security personnel killing and wounding ISAF troops.

Background on green-on-blue attacks in Afghanistan

There have now been three green-on-blue attacks reported this month (ISAF as a matter of policy does not report on attacks that do not result in deaths, however this trend seems to be changing). On July 1, three British military advisers were killed by an Afghan policeman in Helmand province in southern Afghanistan. And on July 5, five ISAF personnel were wounded in an attack in Wardak.

Afghan security personnel are now estimated to have killed 89 ISAF soldiers since May 2007. To date, 27 of the 89 ISAF soldiers, or more than 30 percent, have been killed this year. These attacks have taken place in all areas in Afghanistan, not just in the south and east.

In May, ISAF commander General John Allen said that about half of the green-on-blue attacks have been carried out by Taliban infiltrators. The Taliban routinely take credit for these attacks.

The rise in attacks against ISAF troops by Afghan personnel takes place as ISAF is seeking to accelerate the transition of security responsibility to Afghan forces. The plan calls for an increase in the number of ISAF trainers as well as more partnering of ISAF and Afghan units, and will heighten Coalition troops’ exposure to green-on-blue attacks. The US military has become so concerned with the green-on-blue attacks that it has ordered units to designate “guardian angels” in each unit whose job is to provide security for troops working with Afghans. But the attacks have not abated.

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: ,


  • Don Bacon says:

    corrections/clarifications required
    #Yesterday’s attack was technically not a green-on-blue attack
    #ISAF as a matter of policy does not report on attacks that do result in deaths,
    #In May, ISAF commander General John Allen said that about half of the green-on-blue attacks have been carried out by Taliban infiltrators.
    May 23, 2012
    KABUL – Less than 50 percent of so-called “green on blue” attacks are perpetrated by Taliban infiltrators into the Afghan army, the US and NATO Commander General John Allen said Sunday.

  • ArneFufkin says:

    @John: The victims in the “yesterday’s attack” Bill was referring to were civilian contractors working with ISAF – so it was not technically a green on blue assault.

  • Zeissa says:

    F. Franco would never have put up with this (I’m not ok with many of his methods, though the republicans started their revolution after winning their election, but he was effective and it’d be better than this mess by far).


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram