Taliban denies agreement reached with US on elections, demands “an Islamic government”

The Taliban confirmed that it met with a high-level delegation of US officials in Qatar, and quashed news reports that the group wanted the Afghan government to postpone the April 2019 presidential elections and establish an interim government. Yet again, the Taliban insisted that “an Islamic government,” a not-so-vague reference to its Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, rule the country.

The meeting, which took place from Nov. 14 to Nov. 16, was confirmed in an official statement at Voice of Jihad, the organization’s official website. The statement was signed by Zabihullah Mujahid, the “Spokesman of Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.”

The meeting was reported in Western news services. According to The Associate Press, “the Taliban pressed for a postponement of next year’s presidential elections and the establishment of an interim government under a neutral leadership.”

US envoy Zalmay Khalilzad, who has been tasked by the Trump administration to negotiate a peace agreement with the Taliban, claimed “there is an opportunity for reconciliation and peace” and said that Taliban negotiators are “saying they do not believe they can succeed militarily.” The Taliban’s actions on the battlefield and its daily public statements indicate otherwise.

In Mujahid’s response to press reports of the meeting, it described the meetings in Qatar as “preliminary talks” and said that “no agreement was reached on any issue.” The Taliban has, as it has in failed talks after the US surge ended in 2013, demanded that its leaders be removed from the United Nations Security Council sanctions list, its members freed from prisons, its political office in Qatar be officially recognized, and the end to “propaganda” against the group, before it actually starts negotiations.

Instead, Mujahid said that the “representatives of Islamic Emirate discussed the current situation of Afghanistan, insisted on the requirement of an Islamic government and finding a true solution to the problems.”

The true solution, the Taliban has insisted for well over a decade, is the withdrawal of US and western forces. Only then, the Taliban claims, can “peace” be considered. The withdrawal of Western forces would of course put Afghan security forces, which are struggling to maintain control of increasingly smaller areas of the country even while the US and NATO are present, at the predations of a confident Taliban.

The reference to the “Islamic government” that Mujahid insists must replace the current Afghan government is the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The Taliban uses these two terms interchangeably in its statements. In its last statement laying out its conditions for peace, the Taliban referred to itself as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan 61 times. The Taliban has insisted that the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan is the only true and Islamic representative of the Afghan people. It has referred to the Afghan government as an “un-Islamic” “stooge” and “puppet” of the West, and has refused to share power with it.

In Mujahid’s latest statement the Taliban described the press reports, which quoted unnamed Taliban figures, as “propaganda being spread by media outlets.”

“They are deliberately trying to stoke worry and uncertainty,” Mujahid continued. “We want to reassure our Mujahideen and Muslim nation that the representatives of the Islamic Emirate will never agree to anything that does not adhere to Islamic principles, policy of the Islamic Emirate and the lofty aspirations of the martyrs and Mujahideen fighting on the battlefields.”

While some Afghan watches may dismiss Mujahid’s statement as potential damage control or spin, the fact is that the Taliban has consistently adhered to its very public statements about its prerequisites for negotiations, and its ultimate demand for peace. The Taliban even walked away from preliminary talks after the surge, arguably when it was weakest at any point during the 17 year long war.

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? This holiday season we are asking readers to support our independent reporting and analysis by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: ,

2 Comments

  • Paddy Singh says:

    Can’t the US understand the English that the Taliban speak? The US seems to be at odds with whatever they claim and with all the US bluff and bluster along with painted optimism, one is more inclined to believe the Taliban – that the Americans have lost the war. The Taliban want the Yanks to leave first before they talk to the puppets in Afghanistan. The only alternative one sees is that the Americans have lost this war as well at the cost of billion upon billions of American taxpayers money and the alleged super power is no longer one.

  • We should have understood something when the Taliban said no to our ultimatum to turn over BenLaden(sp) after 9-11 in the face of the most powerful army in the world when they had a nothing army and a very poorly run government…and they knew it. That was some 17 years of war ago.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Iraq

Islamic state

Syria

Aqap

Al shabaab

Boko Haram

Isis

Please support FDD’s Long War Journal, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, by donating to our year-end fundraiser.

For over a decade, we have provided original and detailed reporting on the jihadist threat to the United States and its allies.

We do not accept funding from foreign governments. We rely on the support of readers like you.

Please support our mission and make a tax-deductible donation this holiday season. Thank you for your support!

Donate Today!