Islamic State claims car bombing in southeastern Turkey


The Islamic State has claimed responsibility for massive car bombing in the city of Diyarbakir, which is in southeastern Turkey. Citing the government-run Anadolu Agency, the Associated Press reported that at least nine people (two policemen and seven civilians) were killed and upwards of 100 more were wounded. The Islamic State’s Amaq News Agency claimed the blast hours after it rocked the city.

Citing a “security source,” Amaq claimed: “Fighters from the Islamic State set off a car bomb parked in front of the headquarters of the Turkish police in Diyarbakir in southeast Turkey.”

Turkish authorities quickly blamed the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), a US-designated terrorist organization. It is possible the PKK did carry out the attack. But if the Islamic State’s claim is accurate, then the so-called caliphate’s men carried it out just two days after Abu Bakr al Baghdadi called for attacks inside Turkey.

On Nov. 2, the Islamic State released the first audio message from Baghdadi in nearly one year. Baghdadi spent part of his address blasting the “apostate Turkey” for showing its true “face” by striking inside the lands of the caliphate. The Islamic State’s emir said that the Turkish government thinks it can safely “descend” onto the “battlefields of the sons of monotheism and the lions of jihad,” but they are not truly secure. Baghdadi called on his loyalists to bring Turkey into their “conflict,” while also fighting those Turkish soldiers who have come to them in the Levant. He likened “infidel” Turkish soldiers to dogs.

Earlier this year, Turkey launched Operation Euphrates Shield, which has successfully claimed territory from the Islamic State in northern Syria. In his audio address, Baghdadi argued that Turkey has taken advantage of the fact that his men have been distracted by the “war against the infidel nations” and have been forced to defend their territory.

In the past, the Islamic State has been deliberately ambiguous about high-profile terrorist attacks inside Turkey. For example, it is widely suspected that the group was responsible for the suicide bombings and shootings at the Atatürk Airport in Istanbul in late June. Forty-five people were killed and more than 200 others were wounded.

But the Islamic State never claimed responsibility for the high-profile assault in Istanbul. By contrast, Amaq issued a statement regarding the car bombing in Diyarbakir just hours after the fact. As opposed to Istanbul, Diyarbakir is a major city in the part of the country that is predominately Kurdish. And the Islamic State has been fighting Kurdish forces in Iraq and Syria for years.

Still, Baghdadi’s call for operations inside Turkey was clear. And his men claim to have followed through on his threat by attacking Turkish police.

Thomas Joscelyn is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Senior Editor for FDD's Long War Journal.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: , , , , ,


  • Eugene says:

    All things considered, which country-proxy is al Baghdadi affiliated with, as in who gave him his start & finances his brand? Any one care to comment?

  • den says:

    Erdogan seems content on blaming everything on the Kurds, hoping it so, giving him reason to attack them and thereby convincing the public of his theory (paranoia) that everyone is in on the coup. How he convinced NATO is purely

  • Birbal Dhar says:

    I wonder if it was a car suicide bomber? or plainly someone leaving the car with explosives and letting it blow up, while they fled

  • jack says:

    would love to own a used car lot there! biz is boooooooooming!

  • Edward G. Stafford says:

    This would not be the first attack in Turkey by the so-called Islamic State, though perhaps the first that focused on Turkish persons and security forces vice foreigners and/or Kurds. The possibility that PKK carried out the attack should not be completely discounted, for they have often targeted Turkish security forces, but the claim by ISIS tilts suspicion towards ISIS, not the PKK. Now that Turkey is blocking re-supply of men and materiel to ISIS, it should surprise no one that ISIS is willing to attack Turkey even if it is led and populated mainly by those of Sunni heritage.

  • fern says:

    This was a friendly show of force by the IS, the real terrorists are the PKK allied with Gülen.


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram