Treasury: Iranian intelligence supporting al Qaeda

The US Treasury Department today designated the Iranian Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS) “for its support to terrorist groups as well as its central role in perpetrating human rights abuses against the citizens of Iran and its role in supporting the Syrian regime as it continues to commit human rights abuses against the people of Syria.”

Al Qaeda and its affiliate, al Qaeda in Iraq, are among the terrorist groups supported by the MOIS, which is Iran’s chief intelligence agency.

“Today we have designated the MOIS for abusing the basic human rights of Iranian citizens and exporting its vicious practices to support the Syrian regime’s abhorrent crackdown on its own population,” Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence David S. Cohen explained in a press release. “In addition, we are designating the MOIS for its support to terrorist groups, including al Qaeda, al Qaeda in Iraq, Hezbollah and HAMAS, again exposing the extent of Iran’s sponsorship of terrorism as a matter of Iranian state policy.”

The MOIS is assisting al Qaeda in a variety of ways. According to Treasury, the “MOIS has facilitated the movement of al Qaeda operatives in Iran and provided them with documents, identification cards, and passports.”

In addition, the MOIS has “provided money and weapons to al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI)…and negotiated prisoner releases of AQI operatives.”

Previous designations tying Iran and al Qaeda

This is not the first time the Treasury Department has targeted the nexus between Iran and al Qaeda.

In July 2011, Treasury designated an al Qaeda leader known as Yasin al Suri along with five other terrorist operatives who use Iranian soil to move funds and recruits from Iran’s neighboring Gulf countries to South Asia and elsewhere. Al Suri’s network assists not only senior al Qaeda operatives in Pakistan, but also al Qaeda in Iraq.

The Treasury Department said that al Suri’s network operates as part of a “secret deal” between al Qaeda and the Iranian government. In December 2011, US authorities announced a $10 million reward for information leading to al Suri’s capture.

Recent press reports indicate that the scrutiny placed on al Suri has led to his replacement as the head of al Qaeda’s Iran franchise. The terrorist who has reportedly replaced him is a notorious al Qaeda financier named Mohsen al Fadhli. In addition to working with al Qaeda in Iraq and its deceased leader, Abu Musab al Zarqawi, al Fadhli is wanted for his involvement in al Qaeda’s international terrorist plotting. Namely, al Fadhli helped finance the Oct. 6, 2002 attack on the French ship MV Limburg and has been tied to the Oct. 8, 2002 attack against US Marines stationed on Kuwait’s Faylaka Island. One Marine was killed during the Faylaka Island shootout.

Also included in the July 2011 designation was Atiyah Abd al Rahman, who commanded al Qaeda in northern Pakistan. Rahman was killed in a US drone strike in August 2011, the month after the Treasury Department’s designation. According to press reports, he had been planning terrorist attacks in the West at the behest of Osama bin Laden, the al Qaeda master who was killed in May 2011. With respect to Rahman, the Treasury Department noted that he “was previously appointed by Osama bin Laden to serve as al Qaeda’s emissary in Iran, a position which allowed him to travel in and out of Iran with the permission of Iranian officials.” Rahman received safe haven inside Iran after the Sept. 11 attacks.

In September 2011, the US State Department designated a Hamas operative who is tied to both Iran and al Qaeda. The terrorist, Muhammad Hisham Muhammad Isma’il Abu Ghazala, fought for Ansar al Islam. Abu Ghazala “plays an integral role in Hamas,” the State Department said in a press release at the time. “He has links to Iran, the world’s leading State Sponsor of Terrorism, and al Qaeda.” Abu Ghazala is an improvised explosive device (IED) facilitator who has provided weapons to al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations inside Iraq.

In January 2009, the Treasury Department designated four other al Qaeda members operating in Iran.

The January 2009 designation included Mustafa Hamid, the father-in-law of top al Qaeda operative Saif al Adel, and Saad bin Laden, one of Osama’s sons.

Hamid was described as “a senior al Qaeda associate who served as a primary interlocutor between al Qaeda and the Government of Iran.” During the 1990s, Hamid “reportedly negotiated a secret relationship between Osama Bin Laden and Iran, allowing many al Qaeda members safe transit through Iran to Afghanistan.” Hamid also “passed communications between Osama bin Laden and the Government of Iran.” In late 2001, Hamid negotiated with the Iranians to relocate al Qaeda families to Iranian soil. Saif al Adel, Hamid’s son-in-law, was among them. Al Adel has been wanted since late 1998 for his involvement in al Qaeda’s embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania.

Saad bin Laden “facilitated the travel of Osama bin Laden’s family members from Afghanistan to Iran” beginning in late 2001. He also “made key decisions for al Qaeda and was part of a small group of al Qaeda members that was involved in managing the terrorist organization from Iran.”

Saad bin Laden relocated to northern Pakistan several years later and was reportedly killed in an airstrike. However, al Qaeda has never confirmed Saad’s putative death.

The other two al Qaeda members included in the January 2009 designation were Muhammad Rab’a al Sayid Al Bahtiyti and Ali Saleh Husain.

Al Bahtiyti is a longtime member of Egyptian Islamic Jihad and al Qaeda, and was reportedly involved in al Qaeda’s 1995 bombing of the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan. Ayman al Zawahiri, who is now al Qaeda’s emir, tasked al Bahtiyti with moving members of Zawahiri’s family to Iran after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Husain had long worked with top al Qaeda operative Abu Zubaydah and was involved in shuttling al Qaeda fighters from Afghanistan to Iran following the fall of the Taliban’s


All four of the al Qaeda members designated in January 2009 were placed under a loose form of “house arrest” by the Iranians in 2003, after al Qaeda’s Iran network was tied to multiple terrorist attacks abroad, including the May 12, 2003 bombings in Riyadh.

However, Iran has continued to allow al Qaeda to operate on Iranian soil.

Thomas Joscelyn is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Senior Editor for FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags: , ,


  • reliapundit says:


  • Paul says:

    It’s hard not to be cynical about American foreign policy when Iran gets ever more sanctions and Pakistan gets ever more $ billions

  • Bob says:

    Al Qaeda affiliates with Pakistani terrorist groups that target Shia
    Al Qaeda in Iraq targets Shia
    Al Qaeda is now targeting Iranian ally Syria.
    This don’t make sense,

  • JRP says:

    Amen to Paul . . . We can still be a friend to Israel without letting Israel snooker us into going to war with Iran. We are being fed a lot of disinformation when it comes to Iran. Even many well-respected people in the Israeli intelligence community are counseling against attacking Iran. Pakistan’s hospitality to Al Qaeda is our #1 problem. Close behind in the #2 slot is the Taliban’s hospitality to Al Qaeda. Frankly, we shouldn’t be worried about Iraq, Syria, Lybia, Iran, Lebanon, the Gaza Strip, whatever. We need to concentrate on Pakistan, Afghanistan, Al Qaeda, and the Taliban. Inasmuch as Pakistan already has a substantial number of nukes, I don’t see our security substantially strenghened by warring on Iran just to deprive it of nukes. With or without Iran, arguably the bad guys can obtain nukes from Pakistan and soon North Korea. I’ve said this before . . . We should take a page from John F. Kennedy’s handling of the Cuban Missile Crisis in October 1962. He went on national TV and said that any nuclear launch from Cuba would be deemed to have come from what was then called the Soviet Union. He said we would hit back accordingly, meaning retaliating against the Soviets. Similarly, we should proclaim that any nuclear attack on the U.S. is going to result in a “round up the usual suspects” approach by our military. We shouldn’t go through the diplomatic niceties of trying to figure out which bad country supplied the terrorists with the bomb. Take ’em all out. Believe me, Russia and China won’t do anything about it.

  • Devin Leonard says:

    I agree with JRP. Personally I would love to see Iran’s Quds force and IRG get bombed to pieces by our cruise missles and B2 stealths. And I am as pro Isreal as the next guy…but now is not the time for another war. If Iran attacks us first or is Isreal attacks without or knoweldge and Iran attacks us, then all bets are off and we should use full force to decimate their military and Navy…but we should not be drawn into a conflict by Israeli war-mongering.

  • Charu says:

    This doesn’t makes too much sense, except in the adage, “my enemy’s enemy is my friend”. Even if the enemy’s enemy is as much my enemy… my head hurts! Sunni terrorism and Shia terrorism are two sides of the same coin. The Saudis sell us oil and use the profits to incite and fund terrorism against our values. The Iranians would be happy to do the same, but because of their more recent history they ended up as the “bad Taliban” while the Saudis, escorted hand-in-hand and bowed-down to by our Presidents, are the “good Taliban”. The smart money would be to play off the Sunni and Shia terrorists against each other; but instead they adeptly play us against our allies.

  • Qadeer Ahmed says:

    United States can blame to any Country. Once its blames Al Qaeda affiliates with Pakistani terrorist groups, Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, Al Qaeda in Iraq and now Al Qaeda in Iran and Iranian intelligence agencies supporting them. United States strategy is still not under stood.
    A series of steps and the movement the US has taken to increase pressure on Iran over its nuclear program, which Tehran says is for peaceful purposes.

  • Mr. Wolf says:

    It would be interesting to see multiple explosions across the country, but not on any military installation, instead on safe houses along the Af/Pak border region. This solves two problems, one; easing of the tense standoff between hawks and doves (in both countries), two; create obstacles that solve some of the transit problems the Afghan army is trying to cut off coming into the country, and three; to allow the Moderate Islamic community (which is quiet in Iran, but present) a feather in their cap for the upcoming elections by asserting cooperation not confrontation when dealing with sanctions. Just my opinion, but there is a lot of gray when dealing with “no war” but only black & white when war is declared.

  • Javier says:

    Al Qaeda affiliates with Pakistani terrorist groups that target Shia
    Al Qaeda in Iraq targets Shia
    Al Qaeda is now targeting Iranian ally Syria.
    This don’t make sense.

    Agreed. The US Treasury Department’s claims is dubious at best, given Iran’s hostility toward al-Qaeda.


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram