‘A thin distance separated Lashkar and the ISI’


While Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence agency refuses to admit it backs the radical, al Qaeda-linked Lashkar-e-Taiba, US intelligence officials and even Lashkar-e-Taiba operatives beg to differ. From a report in The New York Times on Lashkar-e-Taiba and its attack on Mumbai, India:

But a senior American intelligence official said the ISI was believed to maintain ties with Lashkar. Four Lashkar members, interviewed individually, said only a thin distance separated Lashkar and the ISI, bridged by former ISI and military officials.

One highly placed Lashkar militant said the Mumbai attackers were part of groups trained by former Pakistani military and intelligence officials at Lashkar camps. Others had direct knowledge that retired army and ISI officials trained Lashkar recruits as late as last year.

“Some people of the ISI knew about the plan and closed their eyes,” said one senior Lashkar operative in Karachi who said he had met some of the gunmen before they left for the Mumbai assault, though he did not know what their mission would be.

Former ISI officials, such as retired Lieutenant General Hamid Gul, the intelligence service’s former director, openly support groups such as Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Taliban, and al Qaeda, yet they are untouchable in Pakistan.

For more on the ISI’s links to terror groups, see “Pakistan’s Jihad,” written by Tom Joscelyn and me in December last year.

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: ,


  • T Ruth says:

    Also from the same story in The Times
    “”Hafiz Saeed is the army’s man,”

  • Mr T says:

    Why do Pakistanis hate India so much that government institutions would advocate attacks on civilians like in Mumbai? They really seem to go to extreme lengths. The Indians seem so nice. W#hat have they done to deserve this ire and vitriol?

  • Spooky says:

    Envy, vengeance, and paranoia.
    Envy because India’s muslims do better than the muslims in the country created for them.
    Vengeance because India has won every war they fought against Pakistan, plus liberated Bangladesh.
    And paranoia because they think India will attack them first. Also, if India wins the Kashmir dispute, there is paranoia that the rest of Pakistan would fall apart.

  • Rhyno327 says:

    T RUTH you are so right. They milk us for billions while playing both sides. If India and PAK started shooting at each other, wat should we do? I would hope we help INDIA smash the 2 faced dogs that is P-stan. A nation of liars and backstabbers. ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM is this century’s NAZI’s.


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram