« ISIS holds military parade in Mosul | Main | ISIS advances on oil fields in Salahaddin, Diyala »

LeT designation notes group's recent attack in western Afghanistan

Raids against al Qaeda and allied groups in Afghanistan - 2013. Special operations forces launched 42 raids in 2013 between Jan. 1 and the beginning of June, when ISAF ended its operational reporting. Raids against al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba alone took place in Ghazni, Nangarhar, Kunar, and Nuristan. Click link to view in a larger map.

In today's designation of two Lashkar-e-Taiba leaders as well as the identification of additional aliases for the terror group, the US government disclosed an interesting piece of information: Lashkar-e-Taiba executed an attack in western Afghanistan as recently as late May. From the State Department designation:

More recently, LeT was responsible for the May 23, 2014 attack on the Indian Consulate in Herat, Afghanistan.

Below is a description of the failed attack in Herat city, the provincial capital, from The Times of India:

Gunmen armed with machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades attacked the Indian consulate in western Afghanistan's Herat province on Friday, an assault that injured no diplomatic staff, police said. Indian diplomats said there had been a threat against its diplomats in Afghanistan, but gave no other details.

The three gunmen opened fire on the consulate from a nearby home, provincial police chief Abdul Sami Qatra said. Police killed two of the three gunmen, though one continued to fire on security forces trying to secure the area, Qatra said.

No group immediately claimed responsibility for the attack. Afghanistan is experiencing a rise in insurgent attacks as foreign troops plan to withdraw from the country by the end of the year.

Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Syed Akbaruddin said a deployment of their own police at the consulate held off the assault until Afghan forces arrived. He said all Indians at the consulate were safe.

Now, take a look at the map above, which documents the special operations raids by Coalition forces against al Qaeda and its allies, such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, that were reported in ISAF press releases from the beginning of January 2013 until June 2013, when ISAF stopped issuing the reports. Note that not a single raid was reported in Herat city or even remotely close.

Now, take a look at the maps showing raids between 2007 and 2012, published in this LWJ report, ISAF raids against al Qaeda and allies in Afghanistan 2007-2013. Again, note that there were no raids against LeT, al Qaeda, IMU, etc., in Herat during those years.

This doesn't mean LeT or al Qaeda or other foreign terrorist groups weren't operating in Herat during those years. It just means that if raids in Herat and the surrounding areas occurred, ISAF didn't issue any reports on them.

The maps published at LWJ in late May that detail ISAF's raids are merely a subset of what we know about al Qaeda, LeT, IMU, etc., operations in Afghanistan. Those maps show what ISAF chose to report in its daily operational press releases. Our sources say there were many more raids that went unreported. Additionally, the maps do not detail the enemy's own operations.

State's designation reminds us that al Qaeda, LeT, IMU, and allied groups continue to operate in Afghanistan despite the reduction of reporting on their activities.

READER COMMENTS: "LeT designation notes group's recent attack in western Afghanistan"

Posted by Birbal Dhar at June 25, 2014 1:43 PM ET:

The LET did not give up terrorism after Mumbai in 2008. They're still trying to attack Indian interests. Thankfully they failed miserably like their Pakistani ISI handlers, whose army colleagues are brilliantly butchered by islamic terrorists, who they created. As Hilary Clinton mentioned, you can't keep poisonous snakes in your backyard and expect them not to attack you.


The comments section is intended to provide a forum to discuss and debate current posts. The Long War Journal makes no warranty to the accuracy of readers' comments, nor do we condone or affirm the opinions of reader-based comments. Discuss the issue at hand and do not go off topic. The comments section is not a place for partisan debates. Please be courteous to your fellow commenters. Personal attacks on the editors, authors, or readers of The Long War Journal sites will not be permitted. Please refer to current and former elected officials and public leaders respectfully. Offensive language, cursing (including replacing letters with characters), racial or ethnic slurs, and sexist remarks will not be tolerated. In the interest of keeping the comments section readable, please post a link to any articles, and excerpt the portions of the article that make your points. Any comments with the full article will be edited.

Commenters will be required to leave an e-mail address and are encouraged to submit their website or URL also. E-mail addresses will not be published to the site; however, if it is determined that it is a false address, the comment will be removed.

The Long War Journal reserves the right to edit, delete, or decline to publish any comments that violate this policy, and prevent any repeat offender from commenting.

If you have any questions on the comments policy or problems with the site, email Bill Roggio.

Post a Comment