« Omar Hammami on drone strikes | Main | Suicide bomber kills 9 in Syria »




Mullah Dadullah Front: a not-so-new Afghan Taliban terror group



This article in The New York Times would have you believe that the Mullah Dadullah Front is a newly created terror group that suddenly popped up in Afghanistan:

A new, more radical insurgent group has begun a campaign aimed at terrorizing both Afghan officials and moderate insurgents, according to Afghan officials.

While the Taliban publicly disavowed the new group, Afghan intelligence officials depicted it as a faction of the Taliban that is "behind the current campaign of psychological and terror attacks," as one official put it.

Calling itself the Mullah Dadullah Front, after a notoriously bloodthirsty Taliban commander who was killed in 2007 in a joint operation, people claiming to represent the group have in recent days sent text messages and made telephone calls to numerous members of the Afghan Parliament, threatening them with suicide attacks if they vote to ratify the strategic partnership agreement between Afghanistan and the United States.

The Long War Journal first reported on the Mullah Dadullah Front on Dec. 4, 2010, when ISAF named the group when it targeted one of its financiers. We even identified the top leader of the Mullah Dadullah Front as well as the group's spokesman:

The Mullah Dadullah Lang Allegiance is better known as the Mullah Dadullah Mahaz, or Mullah Dadullah Front. It is named after Mullah Dadullah Lang, a popular but brutal and effective commander, who was killed by British special forces in Helmand province in May 2007. Dadullah was responsible for embracing al Qaeda's ideology of waging global jihad, and incorporated al Qaeda tactics, including the use of suicide bombers, on the battlefield.

The Mullah Dadullah Front operates largely in the southern Afghan provinces of Kandahar, Helmand, and Uruzgan, and is considered the most effective and dangerous Taliban group in the region. The group has been active in attempting to sabotage negotiations between the Afghan government and lower-level Taliban leaders and fighters in the south.

Although ISAF did not name the leader of the Mullah Dadullah Front, US military and intelligence officials told The Long War Journal that it is led by none other than Mullah Adbul Qayoum Zakir, the former Guantanamo Bay detainee who has since been promoted as the Taliban's top military commander. He is considered to be one of the most radical Taliban commanders and is closely allied with al Qaeda.

Zakir, who is also known as Abdullah Ghulam Rasoul, was released from US custody in December 2007, and was then promptly freed by the Afghan government [see LWJ report, The Taliban's surge commander was Gitmo detainee]. Zakir immediately returned to the Taliban and quickly rose in the ranks. This spring, Zakir was designated as one of two Taliban commanders to replace Mullah Baradar, Mullah Omar's former deputy and the second in command of the Taliban who was put into protective custody by Pakistan's intelligence service earlier this year. Zakir now commands all military operations in Afghanistan.

Zakir and other Taliban leaders operate from the Pakistani border city of Chaman in Baluchistan, as the location shields them from US and NATO operations.

The spokesman for the Mullah Dadullah Front has been identified as Barialay Rahbarmal. In mid-October, Rahbarmal claimed that the Taliban had killed seven Afghan soldiers in the Marja area of Helmand province using a new type of hand grenade. Rahbarmal made the claim to Al Qalam, a jihadist website run by the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terror group that supports al Qaeda and is backed by Pakistan's military and intelligence services.

Over the past 18 months, LWJ has documented multiple assassinations and suicide assaults in the south that have been linked to the Mullah Dadullah Front. Click here and here for a list of the articles on the Mullah Dadullah Front.



READER COMMENTS: "Mullah Dadullah Front: a not-so-new Afghan Taliban terror group"

Posted by mike merlo at May 20, 2012 9:35 PM ET:

The fact that the NYT would be playing 'catch up' with the news while simultaneously misrepresenting information comes as little or no surprise. The print media's pursuit of headline's & numbers has them constantly skirting the truth. Regularly employing sensationalism & the tactic of retracting after having printed a falsehood is now customary even by a fading legend such as the NYTs.

The NYTs article author, Rod Nordland, regularly portrays US efforts in unfavorable terms. Even this NYT article cited by B Roggio had discrepancies by Rod Nordland needing correction.

The fact that the Mullah Dadullah Front is a collection of degenerate psychopath's, clinically certifiable pathologies, etc., is the sign of an adversary in serious decline yet warranting an extremely high level of attention.

Earlier observations by TLWJ of disorder within the ranks of the Taliban & their associates will continue to surface with semi regularity. Zawahiri's blood lust knows no limits. I wonder how long before the Warren Weinstein video shows up with him getting his head cut off.

Posted by villiger at May 21, 2012 1:41 AM ET:

Bill, you're right to highlight this and keep the NYT on their toes. The article struck me also as very odd.

The heading "In Afghanistan, New Group Begins Campaign of Terror" leads one to think that they were trying to be sensational. One really wonders about what their editor is up to!

Meantime, thanks for posting the other article by the NYT on the supply lines, if i can link it here again:http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/21/world/two-critical-ties-in-play-for-obama-at-nato-meeting.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2&ref=world

I especially like:
“This whole breakdown in the relationship between the U.S. and Pakistan has come down to a fixation of this apology issue,” said Vali Nasr, a former State Department adviser on Pakistan. The combination of no apology and no meeting, Mr. Nasr said, “will send a powerfully humiliating message back to Pakistan.”

But shameless people that the Paqis are, can they really be humiliated?

On another angle to this the TOI states:
"Last week, the US Congress approved an amendment to a bill under which Washington could block up to $650 million in proposed payments to Pakistan unless Islamabad lets coalition forces resume shipments. The vote was an overwhelming 412-1 in favor of the amendment, indicative of the mood in Congress. The US also has various other levers to bring Pakistan to heel, including squeezing bilateral and multilateral aid, which it has so far been reluctant to use."

How is it that the NYT has failed to report the abovementioned, overwhelming vote?

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/Hafta-discord-US-Pak-squabble-over-transit-fee/articleshow/13317879.cms

While we're talking Paq, Ravi Rikhye's blog on the Abbotabad doctor in the OBL case is worth reading.

Scroll down to May 19 at http://orbat.com/

Posted by mike merlo at May 21, 2012 11:11 AM ET:

"But shameless people that the Paqis are, can they really be humiliated?" Funny line.

Posted by bjnh at May 25, 2012 9:27 AM ET:

But shameless people that the Paqis are, can they really be humiliated?

On another angle to this the TOI states:
"Last week, the US Congress approved an amendment to a bill under which Washington could block up to $650 million in proposed payments to Pakistan unless Islamabad lets coalition forces resume shipments. The vote was an overwhelming 412-1 in favor of the amendment, indicative of the mood in Congress. The US also has various other levers to bring Pakistan to heel, including squeezing bilateral and multilateral aid, which it has so far been reluctant to use."

Good