The Islamic State’s Amaq News Agency has issued a statement claiming that the terrorist responsible for yesterday’s attack in London was a “soldier” of the so-called caliphate.
Citing a security “source,” Amaq states: “The attacker yesterday in front of the British parliament in London was a soldier of the Islamic State, executing the operation in response to calls to target citizens of coalition nations.”
Amaq’s claim is similar to a series of statements that were issued after past operations across Europe and the US.
Thus far, Amaq hasn’t provided any specific details about the man responsible for killing at least three people, including an American citizen and a British policeman, and wounding dozens of others. The terrorist drove his vehicle into a crowd, then jumped out and used a blade to assault other people.
The UK Metropolitan Police has identified the terrorist as Khalid Masood, a 52 year-old man who was born in Kent and is believed to have been “most recently living in the West Midlands.” Masood was “known by a number of aliases,” but “was not the subject of any current investigations and there was no prior intelligence about his intent to mount a terrorist attack.
However, the Metropolitan Police says Masood “was known to police and has a range of previous convictions for assaults” and other crimes. His criminal record reportedly extends all the way back to Nov. 1983 and “his last conviction was in Dec. 2003 for possession of a knife.”
Abu Bakr al Baghdadi’s propagandists have repeatedly encouraged followers to ram their vehicles into Western citizens. Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) has also promoted the idea.
Last year, jihadists used trucks during attacks in Nice on Bastille Day and at a Christmas market in Berlin. In both cases, Amaq described the attackers as a “soldier” of the caliphate.
Another similar assault was carried out at Ohio State University in November, when a Somali refugee, Abdul Razak Ali Artan, drove his car into a crowd of people before exiting the vehicle and then using a knife to assault his victims. Artan was quickly shot dead by a campus police officer. Once again, Amaq described him as the Islamic State’s “soldier.”
Amaq has repeatedly described terrorists as “soldiers” of the Islamic State
In addition to the instances mentioned above, Amaq and other Islamic State propaganda outlets frequently describe the terrorists who carry out such deeds as “soldiers” of the caliphate.
An Islamic State claim of responsibility doesn’t prove that the group had direct ties to the attacker. However, authorities have found that terrorists had digital ties, or were at least inspired by the Islamic State, in a number of cases. Islamic State operatives have also orchestrated a series of plots in the West.
For example, the Islamic State described the May 2015 shooters in Garland, Tex. and the couple who assaulted a holiday party in San Bernardino, Calif. as the group’s “soldiers.” The San Bernardino terrorists were also labeled “supporters.”
The shooters in Garland, Tex. reportedly communicated with Junaid Hussain, a key Islamic State operative who was killed in an American airstrike last year. And the husband and wife jihadists responsible for the massacre in San Bernardino pledged their allegiance to Abu Bakr al Baghdadi on Facebook prior to their demise.
The team of jihadists that carried out the Nov. 2015 assault in Paris was hailed as “a group of believers from the soldiers of the Caliphate.” In that case, the jihadists were directly dispatched by the Islamic State’s mother organization in Syria. The Paris attacks were different from the other, small-scale attacks claimed by the Islamic State and carried out by individuals in Europe.
Omar Mateen, who repeatedly pledged allegiance to Abu Bakr al Baghdadi the night of his shooting at an LGBT nightclub in Orlando, Fla. in June, was described as a “fighter” for the organization.
Amaq said Mohamed Lahouaiej Bouhlel, who drove a truck into a crowd celebrating Bastille Day in Nice, France, was “a soldier of the Islamic State.” The same wording was also used to label a young slasher in Würzburg, Germany.
After the Nice, Würzburg, Ansbach (Germany) and Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray (Normandy, France) attacks, Amaq also emphasized that the men responsible had acted “in response to calls to target countries belonging to the crusader coalition.”
And after the operations in Würzburg, Ansbach, Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray and Balashikha (Russia), Amaq disseminated videos of the terrorists swearing allegiance to Baghdadi. The videos were recorded beforehand, demonstrating that the jihadists had at least some digital ties to the Islamic State’s operations.
Indeed, European officials discovered that a series of plots have been “remote-controlled” by the Islamic State’s digital operatives. American authorities have also found that the so-called caliphate’s men had virtual connections to a number of recruits who were intercepted before they could carry out their murderous acts.
Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.
This group is unique in the sense all rabid animals blog to it and whenever these bite the ISIS makes a claim of dishonour. These vermin should be exterminated by those who created them but the problem is that while they ‘bravely’ went in against a weakened and unarmed Saddam, they are scared witless against the very monsters they brought to life.
Trump Jr. is right. The UK can thank its fine “leaders” and their “Law Enforcement” enablers for this continued terror.
It is your fine bobbies who make this possible, Great Britain! And the same for Rotherham as well.
Like insurgencies based on fanaticism world wide, the solution lies in opportunity, assimilation, and welfare which enhances the family structure instead of the individual.
Together, these factors can offset the radical imam preaching. Otherwise, the second generation sees the patriarch emasculated and turns to street and the the radical to achieve psychic satisfaction through revenge and is even willing to sacrifice himself.
How perverted is your “religion” if you slaughter the defenseless and then find a reason to justify it?
This attack may well have been a suicide probe but in any event be sure the jihadis are taking notes.
And a tip for those of you walking in big cities—try and walk on the side of the street facing traffic so as to increase your chances of seeing something coming your way.
he is a “lone wolf” and by now 10 other jihadis connected to him have been arrested. And he has been “radicalised to the ideology of terrorism”. What I don’t get is how people can vote for politicians who treat the populace as idiots and cannon fodder.
Debka says the Antwerp and London ops were supposed to be simultaneous:
Wonder what delayed the snake Mohamed in Belgium?
Hope he’s debriefed most enthusiastically.
Well, he’s a dead soldier you dirtbags.
Yup. Good and dead.
Khalid was such a good boy he even travelled to the Kingdom three times for “inspiration”.
Saudis don’t just finance and direct Al Qaeda, they finance and direct Islamic State too.