Zawahiri calls on Muslims to implement sharia


Ayman al Zawahiri, in his videotape eulogizing Osama bin Laden. Image courtesy of the SITE Intelligence Group.

Al Qaeda has released a statement written by Ayman al Zawahiri this past summer in which the terror chieftain outlines several goals for Muslims to strive toward. While failing to mention the toll al Qaeda’s attacks have taken on Muslim civilians, Zawahiri says that the Muslim Ummah faces the “most vicious Crusader campaign in its history,” according to a translation provided by SITE Intelligence Group.

Zawahiri does not call on Muslims to strike the US. Instead, al Qaeda’s emir says that “secular and Crusader forces” are attempting to prevent Muslims from implementing sharia law. And to combat this supposed anti-Muslim coalition, Zawahiri argues, Muslims should first work “to liberate the occupied Muslim lands” and reject “any treaty or agreement or international resolution that grants the disbelievers the right to take over the lands of the Muslim.”

In this context, Zawahiri cites the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, “Russia’s takeover of the lands of Chechnya and the Caucuses,” India’s presence in Kashmir, Spain’s control of formerly Muslim lands, and “China’s takeover of East Turkistan.”

Second, Zawahiri says that Muslims should be ruled according to sharia, while rejecting all other bases for law. Zawahiri specifically rejects the “international order” and the United Nations.

The remaining several goals outlined by Zawahiri focus on similar themes, calling on Muslims to “establish a Caliphate.”

The revolutions ushered in by the Arab Spring are unfinished, according to Zawahiri. Muslims must be made aware “of the necessity of being ruled by Sharia and adhering to the judgments of Islam,” Zawahiri says, according to SITE’s translation. And the people must “continue in their revolution until they uproot the remains of the corrupt regimes, and purify their lands of external humiliation and internal corruption.”

Zawahiri’s focus on so-called “local” concerns is not new. Al Qaeda has always fantasized about acquiring power in the heart of the Muslim world.

The call to implement sharia immediately has become a common rallying cry for al Qaeda, as well as jihadists who are either ideologically or operationally linked to the terror group. It provides a point of contrast to the Islamist governments that have risen to power since early 2011. The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, for example, has advocated a more gradual approach to implementing sharia.

Mohammed al Zawahiri, Ayman’s younger brother, is one of several al Qaeda-linked jihadists who have called upon the Brotherhood to set aside all forms of law other than sharia, which is often poorly defined.

During a recent interview with Cairo’s Al Masry al Youm, the younger Zawahiri was asked what he wants Egyptian President Mohammed Morsi to do. “I demand [that Morsi] and all Muslims to hold on to Allah’s creed, to be pious, to know that they are accountable, to strive to avoid the forbidden and to apply Islamic Sharia,” Mohammed al Zawahiri responded. Sharia “has the solution to all our problems,” he claimed.

Other prominent al Qaeda-affiliated ideologues in Egypt have made the same demand.

Al Qaeda has attempted to rebrand itself in the wake of the Arab Spring as the true defender of Islamic law. In Yemen, Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula adopted the name Ansar al Sharia as a new brand for winning converts. Similarly, al Qaeda-linked organizations have risen under the Ansar al Sharia banner elsewhere.

Zawahiri’s call for Muslims to implement sharia is no accident. Al Qaeda’s brand has been damaged after years of indiscriminate violence inside the Muslim world and the group is attempting to remake its image as the true protector of Islamic law.

Thomas Joscelyn is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Senior Editor for FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags: , ,


  • JRP says:

    Bill . . . You care to share your insights as to where Zawahiri might be hiding and how close, if at all, we might be to getting him?

  • Stephanie says:

    Has this man been increasing his number of videos lately or has he always come out with them this frequently? Or am I just noticing it now?

  • Stephanie says:

    Sorry for my reading comprehension skills. 🙁 I just reread and realized this wasn’t a new video.

  • Spurwing Plover says:

    More and more reasons why we need to pull out of the UNITED NATIONS its full of tyrants and terrorists

  • Neo says:

    It’s too bad the Egyptian police didn’t cut that finger off decades ago. I’ve never seen a man wave his finger so much in my whole life. When the first videos of him came out, when he was in jail after the Sadat assassination, there he was waving that damn finger and railing about sharia law. They should stick that finger up his nose when they bury him.

  • Arjuna says:

    JRP, perhaps you meant to ask Tom, the author of the piece? The best current thinking has AAZ in Pakistan. Rumors of movement to the Arabian Peninsula, PoK or Somalia post-5/11 appear unfounded. The question is, where in Pakistan? He moves, or at least used to. He was in Damadola, Chingai, possibly staying at madrassas and is likely in a Pakistani city now (perhaps Islamabad per a recent book by Pakistani author Imtiaz Gul). He’s a family man too, so pattern of life says more of an Abbottabad compound than a terrorist training camp, esp if he’s in an urban area hunkered down permanently. Does he have contact with Adam Gadahn? They make videos together. US agencies are looking, of course. If he’s in an LeT/JuD ISI(rogue/s-wing)-sanctioned location in Islamabad or Rawalpindi, he’d be very hard to access or extract. Small cities make sense too, perhaps even more so. US should focus on family, Adam, couriers & HUMINT!!!

  • Arjuna says:

    Tom, will you offer your thoughts (and Bill if he’s of a mind to) please? I prefer primary (i.e. Pakistani) sources, hence my focus on Imtiaz Gul, whose book and Zawahiri are mentioned here
    and here
    Who are Gul’s sources? Are they properly understood? And, while we’re at it, why did Hamid Mir pull his Osama biography which ostensibly gave a hint at AQ’s (now AAZ’s) strategy? Was he the subject of a gag order/threats? By AQ or their ISI sponsors? Hamid Mir is high profile and may not want to end up like Saleem Shahzad. God save the brave truthseekers in Pakistan!

  • JRP says:

    Thank you Arjuna.


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram