Haqqani Network directed Kabul hotel assault by phone from Pakistan

Afghanistan’s National Intelligence Directorate (NDS) recently disclosed that it intercepted communications on June 28 between fighters who were assaulting the Intercontinental Hotel in Kabul and their Haqqani Network handlers based in Pakistan. In an intercepted phone call, Badruddin Haqqani, a top leader of the terror network, is heard directing one of the fighters and laughing during the attack that killed 11 civilians and two Afghan policemen as well as nine members of the attack team.

On Aug. 31, NDS officials briefed reporters in Kabul on the phone intercepts between Badruddin, another Haqqani Network commander known as Qari Younis, and two of the members of the Continental suicide assault team. The NDS said the phone calls from the Haqqani Network handlers originated from Pakistan, according to Al Jazeera.

Younis is heard giving a Taliban fighter known as Rohullah directions on how to root out foreign guests in the hotel. He advises the fighters in the hotel to conserve their ammunition, send a team downstairs to fight, and then come up with a plan to search the rooms and kill those hiding.

“Use grenades and talk with each other,” Younis advises. “If you’re in agreement go and break down one or two doors. Or, if possible, throw a grenade into the room and then pull back.”

“Whatever you do, make sure these guys don’t get away. OK?” Younis orders.

Badruddin Haqqani is later heard talking to another Taliban fighter named Omar. Badruddin asks Omar if he has enough ammunition and if it is possible to change his location due to a fire in the hotel. Omar says he has “a lot of ammunition” but is unable to move.

“God willing, I’m very relax, lying on this mattress waiting for them,” Omar tells Badruddin.

“God will give you victory,” Badruddin responds, while laughing.


Badruddin Haqqani. Click to view slide show of the Haqqani Network leader.

Badruddin, an operational commander in the Haqqani Network who also sits on the Taliban’s Miramshah Shura, is one of five senior Haqqani Network leaders to have been added to the US’s list of specially designated global terrorists. Also designated are Sirajuddin Haqqani, the overall leader of the Haqqani Network as well as the leader of the Taliban’s Miramshah Regional Military Shura; Nasiruddin Haqqani, a key financier and “emissary”; Khalil al Rahman Haqqani, a key fundraiser, financier, and operational commander for the Haqqani Network; and Mullah Sangeen Zadran, a top military commander in eastern Afghanistan. All five commanders have close ties to al Qaeda.

The back-and-forth during the Intercontinental attack between the Taliban fighters and their handlers in Pakistan is reminiscent of at least three other attacks carried out by terror groups in the region. In all three attacks, the terrorists were directed by commanders based in Pakistan.

In November of 2008, the Lashkar-e-Taiba assault team that attacked hotels and other locations in Mumbai, India, was in constant contact with its six Pakistani handlers. The handlers, who were identified as Zarar, Kafa, Wassi, Jundal, Buzurg, and “Major General,” monitored the news coverage from Mumbai and provided tactical advice to the terrorists holed up in Nariman House and the Taj Mahal and Trident hotels during the three-day siege. In phone intercepts, the handlers are heard laughing and cheering as the suicide assault team gunned down civilians. Several of the handlers have been linked to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI).

More recently, Pakistan-based handlers provided direction to members of a suicide assault team that attacked the Kabul Bank in the eastern Afghan city of Jalalabad in February 2011.

“The planning of this incident-all of it – took place in Pakistan. It took them four months to plan the attack from inside Pakistan,” said NDS spokesman Lutfullha Mashal. “The person who took part on the attack got training in weapons, bomb making, and other tactics in Pakistan.”

Both the Mumbai and the Jalalabad attacks have been linked to the ISI, which actively supports both the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Haqqani Network, as well as several other terror groups in the region.

The ISI’s sponsorship of the Haqqani Network has long been recognized by the US intelligence community, as the relationship dates to the 1980s jihad against the Soviets. A leaked State Department cable titled “Allies Find Briefing On Afghanistan NIE ‘Gloomy,'” and dated Dec. 5, 2008, contains a description of the intelligence community’s National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) for Afghanistan. The NIE was apparently finalized just weeks before, on Nov. 25, 2008.

Dr. Peter Lavoy, who was then the National Intelligence Officer for South Asia and is now the Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Analysis and Chairman of the National Intelligence Council, briefed NATO’s permanent representatives on the NIE. “Although Pakistan now identifies both al Qaeda and the Taliban as existential threats,” Lavoy told NATO’s representatives, “Pakistani government institutions still support the Taliban in two key ways.”

Lavoy explained, according to the leaked cable, that the Pakistani government permits “the Quetta Taliban Shura (the Taliban leadership council) to operate unfettered in Baluchistan province.” And Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) “provides intelligence and financial support to insurgent groups – especially the Jalaluddin Haqqani network out of Miram Shah, North Waziristan – to conduct attacks in Afghanistan against Afghan government, ISAF, and Indian targets.”

When pressed on why Pakistan would continue to support the Taliban, Lavoy proffered three reasons. “First,” Lavoy explained, “Pakistan believes the Taliban will prevail in the long term, at least in the Pashtun belt most proximate to the Pakistani border.”

Second, Lavoy said that “Pakistan continues to define India as its number one threat, and insists that India plays an over-active role in Afghanistan.” And finally, “Pakistani officials think that if militant groups were not attacking in Afghanistan, they would seek out Pakistani targets.”

Furthermore, according to the leaked cable, “Lavoy claimed that the Pakistani Army’s current operations in the FATA’s Bajaur Agency [in late 2008] are directed exclusively against insurgent groups that refused to cooperate, while the Haqqani network remains untouched and continues a policy of cross-border attacks.”

A particularly infamous example of ISI support for the Haqqani Network’s “cross-border attacks” occurred on July 7, 2008, when terrorists attacked the Indian embassy in Kabul. The attack killed more than 40 people. Lavoy is cited in the leaked State Department cable as saying that “India believes without doubt that ISI supported the Haqqani network in orchestrating the Indian Embassy bombing in Kabul.”

The Indians are not the only ones who detected the ISI’s hand in the attack. The New York Times reported on Aug. 1, 2008 that American intelligence officials had come to the same conclusion. “The conclusion was based on intercepted communications between Pakistani intelligence officers and militants who carried out the attack,” US officials told the Times, “providing the clearest evidence to date that Pakistani intelligence officers are actively undermining American efforts to combat militants in the region.”

The US officials cited by the Times “also said there was new information showing that members of the Pakistani intelligence service were increasingly providing militants with details about the American campaign against them, in some cases allowing militants to avoid American missile strikes in Pakistan’s tribal areas.”

Bill Roggio is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Editor of FDD's Long War Journal. Thomas Joscelyn is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Senior Editor for FDD's Long War Journal.

Tags: , ,


  • America must ask its Major Non/NATO ally to provide voice samples.

  • anonymous says:

    If the role of Pakistani military and intelligence agency is clearly against NATO and Afghan gov interest and is the cause of ISAF, ANSF and Civilian deaths on a daily basis and is clearly threatening the whole mission.Is it not worth to clearly make them understand one more time that they will be bombed to stone-age unless they stop harbouring the terrorists against the total failure of 10 years US efforts in both blood and money in the region? I question the will of the US gov regarding WOT, by keeping quiet while Soldiers and Innocent civilians pay the price.

  • CDA says:

    Furthermore, according to the leaked cable, “Lavoy claimed that the Pakistani Army’s current operations in the FATA’s Bajaur Agency [in late 2008] are directed exclusively against insurgent groups that refused to cooperate, while the Haqqani network remains untouched and continues a policy of cross-border attacks.”

    Says it all right there. CIA should be using these “un-cooperative” groups to hit right back at Pakistan. Take a cue from the British Empire – divide and conquer. Support the not-as-bad jihadis in their existential crisis. You’ve got to play dirty to win over there because thats their culture.
    I pray to the heavens that the Afghans will be strong enough to defend themselves from ISI’s ambitions. ANA battalions need to be stationed in these border areas like Kunar to lock out as many insurgents as possible. ISAF needs to mount a large operation despite the high possibility of casualties. We need to do an ‘Afghan Normandy’ before troops get stretched thin. Hell, draft us civilians if need be.

  • Paul D says:

    Pakistan IS the enemy of humankind.
    They dont want peace as the cash cheques will stop.
    They live on handouts paid by China,US,Iran and Russia for different purposes(two faced gits!)

  • Robbie says:

    Pakistan is a nation full of vipers and corruption. Why the US has been an ally of Pakistan and not India all these years has been a huge blunder. Pakistan has been a major sponsor and facilitator to terrorist organizations for a long time. The fact that we give them financial aid, merely props up the status quo. Some of that aid money makes its way to the Taliban groups that we are fighting against. In essence, by giving money to Pakistan we are providing indirect financial support to the same terror organizations who are trying to kill US soldiers and aid/reconstruction workers in Afghanistan.
    The world should have acted after it was determined that the horrific Mumbai attack in 2008 was coordinated by LeT with direct ISI assistance. Pakistan isn’t going to change because we give them money and a moderate amount of verbal pressure to reform and behave. Pakistan is simply out of control and no one is truly in charge. Oh and they have nuclear weapons too.

  • odessa says:

    Is this Pakistan’s way to drain the US/NATO countries of money/assets to let us know that terrorism is alive and well in the region?

  • villiger says:

    One gets a sense that the drones have not been as effective as they should be against this Haqqani mob.
    Is it because of Pakistani protection?

  • David says:

    Why are we not further investigating and reporting on China’s hidden role in supporting the insurgency through proxies like Pakistan and Iran? Shine a light og the country which is arming, encouraging, and may even be directing the global strategic battle with the United States. This kind of reporting is necessary to bring these conflicts to an end.

  • Chris says:

    Leave it to the Afghans(and the NDS in particular) to once again scream to us something that’s been obvious since 2001.

  • Walter Sobchak says:

    Further proof, as if any were necessary, that we are not fighting an Afghan insurgency. We are fighting the State of Pakistan.
    The Paks have us pinned in Afghanistan, we are dependent on them for logistics, so we pay them off with aid, and when they attack India, we make India hold back. The only possible response is to:
    1. Withdraw our troops from Afghanistan so that they can no longer be hostages.
    2. Cut off aid to Pakistan, and sales of weapons.
    3. Take the nukes away from them.
    4. Blow up the airplanes and other defense toys we have given them.
    5. Negotiate an alliance with India.


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram