Islamic State ‘province’ claims attack on Pakistani consulate in Jalalabad

The Islamic State’s Wilayat Khorasan, or “province” in Afghanistan and Pakistan, has claimed responsibility for an attack on the Pakistani consulate in Jalalabad, Afghanistan earlier today. The jihadists laid siege to the consulate for several hours.

16-01-13 Wilayat Khorasan's attack on Pakistani consulate

The Islamic State issued a statement (in multiple languages) describing the assault. The English-language version, which was posted online, can be seen on the right.

The group says that “three inghimasi fighters” were responsible for the operation. The word “inghimasi,” roughly translated, means they are willingly to die in the fight, as they throw themselves into combat. The first detonated his explosive belt, paving the way for the other two to infiltrate the consulate. The second then detonated his suicide belt, while the third supposedly “returned to mujahidin positions safely.”

“The operation lasted for approximately four hours during which the building was destroyed and dozens of consulate staff were killed including a number of apostate Pakistani intelligence officers,” the “caliphate’s” arm claims.

Afghan officials have offered a slightly different account to the press, saying all three jihadists, as well as seven members of the consulate’s security forces, were killed. According to Reuters, Attaullah Khogyani, “a spokesman for the provincial governor, said a suicide bomber had tried to join a queue of people seeking visas to Pakistan and blew himself up after being prevented from entering the building.”

Jalalabad is the capital of Nangarhar, the Afghan province where the Islamic State’s Wilayat Khorasan is based. Before today, the group had not executed many complex assaults in Jalalabad or other Afghan provincial capitals.

The Islamic State will undoubtedly use the assault to further its claim that the Taliban is a proxy of the Pakistani state. The Pakistani Taliban, which is part of the Taliban-al Qaeda axis in the region, has repeatedly attacked Pakistani security forces. But the Islamic State has blasted the Afghan Taliban’s close relationship with the Pakistani state.

For instance, Wilayat Khorasan’s “Voice of the Caliphate” radio station recently claimed that “hundreds” of the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency’s “mercenaries,” acting in the name of the Taliban’s “emirate,” attacked the Islamic State’s mujahideen in the Nazyan District of Nangarhar. In a December 2015 broadcast, the radio station accused Mullah Akhtar Mohammad Mansour, who became the Taliban’s emir in July, of being an “apostate” and said that “juniors” in the Taliban’s ranks shouldn’t “follow the orders of the apostate leaders.”

The Islamic State has consistently accused the Taliban of being a puppet for Pakistan’s ISI, which is the country’s primary intelligence service. It is a claim that has some truth to it, as the ISI has long backed the Taliban’s operations. The “caliphate’s” men are eager to point the relationship out, because it tarnishes the Taliban’s jihadist credentials.

“Voice of the Caliphate” is broadcast in Nangarhar and elsewhere in Afghanistan. [See LWJ report, ‘Voice of the Caliphate’ radio broadcasts anti-Taliban propaganda in Afghanistan.]

It is possible that the Islamic State will use today’s operation to argue that it goes after Pakistan’s representatives in Afghanistan, while the Afghan Taliban typically does not.

The Taliban and the Islamic State’s Wilayat Khorasan have clashed on multiple occasions. Late last year, for instance, Mansour’s men reportedly beheaded several of the “caliphate’s” men. “Voice of the Caliphate” denied this, however, saying the Islamic State’s followers are not so weak that they could be executed in such a manner.

Thomas Joscelyn is a Senior Fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and the Senior Editor for The Long War Journal.

Tags: , , ,

4 Comments

  • dave12 says:

    your explanation of the word inghimasi doesn’t explain the difference between it and istishhadi

    the difference is that ingimasi, as one did in this event, are supposed to raid and come back if at all possible, but accepting that they may well die/do a martyrdom operation during the course of the raid
    and often that they don’t end up killing themselves but are rather killed by the security forces

    whereas in an istishadi it is certain death and they are the ones killing themselves

  • Birbal Dhar says:

    This certainly won’t be the last attack on the Pakistani consulate. After all the Pakistani ISI trains islamic terrorists and now these Frankenstein monsters that have been created by the ISI are now targeting them. What you sow is what you reap !!

  • ulises says:

    NOW THE “ISLAMIC-STATE ATTACK PAKISTAN-AFGHANISTAN AT THE SAME TIME.WHO IS NEXT COUNTRY?INDIA.

  • Mick says:

    It seems the US and its allies are holding the failed state by a tether. How can the transnational terror groups have such free movement after all the millions spent on trying to remove Al-Qaeda and the Taliban since 2003. Now you got ISIS spreading all over India and Pakistan remember these states have nuclear weapons. Also Indonesia has Daseh infiltration on large scale and is Malaysia next?

Iraq

Islamic state

Syria

Aqap

Al shabaab

Boko Haram

Isis