(12)Iraqi security forces detain senior Sadrist during Maysan operation
The Iraqi security forces today formally kicked off the operations against the Mahdi Army in the southern province of Maysan. On the day the government's amnesty offer expired, the Iraqi Army and police conducted multiple raids throughout Amarah, the provincial capital. A senior Sadrist was detained during the raids.
Iraqi forces arrested Rafeaa Jabar, the head of the Sadrist office in Maysan province. He is the mayor of Amarah and the deputy governor of the province.
The Sadrists had stated they feared being the target of the operation. "We do not want Basrah events to be repeated in Amara," Sheikh Salih al Obaidi, the lead spokesman for the Sadrist movement said on June 17. Obaidi instead called for "dialogue." The Sadrist movement also closed down its office in central Amarah and "moved to another 'good location.'"
Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki explicitly stated that the Sadrist movement is not the target of the Amarah operation. "The prime minister has ordered security forces not to arrest members of the Sadr movement randomly," according to a statement issued by Maliki's office. "Only outlaws must be arrested and he hopes that the Sadr leaders will help in isolating such elements to get rid of them."
There have been no reports of major clashes or opposition to the Iraqi operations. Dozens of wanted individuals have been detained and large quantities of weapons have been found during the operation. Sixty "militiamen" surrendered during the amnesty period. A partial curfew has been imposed on some regions.
While the operation officially kicked off today, the Iraqi security forces have been operating in force throughout Maysan since last Saturday, when patrols and raids began in Amarah. Security forces began massing in Amarah last Thursday and Iraqi soldiers replaced border guards along the Iranian border.
A flurry of activity occurred in Amarah on June 18. Iraqi soldiers captured three wanted individuals during an air assault in central Amarah. Twelve policemen were detained for storing weapons and explosives in a jail in the city. Iraqi forces also found a large weapons cache in a cemetery in central Amarah.
Iraqi security forces have also stepped up security in the neighboring provinces of Dhi Qhar and Wasit. North of Maysan in Wasit province said "tight security measures" have been imposed to assist in the Maysan operation, according to security officials. On June 18, police seized a car "laden with 27 Iranian-made bombs" and detained the driver. Coalition forces detained three more Mahdi Army operatives in Al Kut on June 17. The US military has captured 12 mid-level and senior Mahdi Army leaders in Wasit province since June 3.
The Mahdi Army has pushed back in Wasit province. A district police chief and another officer were killed and 10 policemen were wounded in an improvised explosive device attack on June 17.
In Dhi Qhar, which borders Maysan to the south, provincial officials said operations are under way to support the Maysan offensive. "A detailed plan has been established in the province to maintain stability during the expected drive into Maysan province," Staff Brigadier General Sabah al Fatlawi, the provincial chief of police, told Voices of Iraq. Police found a large cache of TNT during a raid in northern Dhi Qhar on June 18.
For background on the Maysan security operation, see:
Report: Iraqi security forces preparing operation against Mahdi Army in Maysan
READER COMMENTS: "Iraqi security forces detain senior Sadrist during Maysan operation"
Posted by David M at June 19, 2008 3:06 PM ET:
The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the blog post From the Front: 06/19/2008 News and Personal dispatches from the front lines.
Posted by Cordell at June 19, 2008 8:25 PM ET:
Bill:
U.S. KIAs this month are running at about one per day, about 50% above the rate for all of May. While some month-to-month variation should be expected, can you explain the recent uptick? If anything, one would think casualties would be falling further after Iraqi forces occupied Sadr City. In addition, how soon do you expect closing off weapons smuggling, (particularly EFPs), from Iran via Maysan to show up in U.S. casualty reports? Are there any other major routes from Iran that need to be plugged?
Many thanks again to you and everyone else at LWJ for the very detailed and informative reports.
Posted by DJ Elliott at June 19, 2008 9:37 PM ET:
Cordell
I know you didn't ask me but,
It only takes one bomb in the right place to match or exceed the 19 KIA in May.
The closer we get to the elections in Iraq and US, the more attempts to spike the casualties will occur.
They are trying for a mini-Tet. Sep/Oct will be peak incident months...
Posted by Dan R. at June 19, 2008 10:12 PM ET:
Well, looks like the "Battle for Amarah" is over. According to the London Times, the IA has occupied the town without a shot being fired. All of Mucky's boys have either bugged out or gone into hiding.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article4175393.ece?Submitted=true
Posted by DJ Elliott at June 19, 2008 10:51 PM ET:
At least 90 had surrendered to ISF by wensday that they did not even have arrest warrents for.
JAM's morale appears to be broken. They are turning themselves in even when we don't know about them...
Posted by Neo at June 20, 2008 12:04 AM ET:
Cordell,
Also take into consideration that all units of both US and IA are very active right now. While the IA is doing the big high visibility operations the US has been very busy with intelligence led operations. I don't think they are going to slow down either, just add more IA units into the mix. Combine this with DJ's point about variability and you've got your answer. Civilian casualties are still trending down.
Posted by Neo at June 20, 2008 12:06 AM ET:
"Al-Mahdi Army militias routed without a shot fired"
Now that's a headline! Amazing isn't it.
I suggested this was a possibility, be seeing it actually happen is another thing alltogether.
There might be a way out of this ugly little war yet.
Posted by Fill at June 20, 2008 12:09 AM ET:
This is fantastic news.
How are the Iraqi forces handling this with regards to potential over-stretch, moral, desertion rates, etc.?
I appreciate your hard work. Thank you.
Posted by Cordell at June 20, 2008 3:26 AM ET:
A promising development from the U.K. Times with respect to future U.S. casualties in Iraq:
"Captain Ali denied that the criminal leaders had been allowed to get away. "We didn't just let them escape, this was a kind of amnesty. This was a last chance for those who were misled by the militias and regretted it," he said. He said that the local population was co-operating with the security sweep, and that the army had found more than 900 roadside bombs in weapons stashes."
Posted by Neo at June 20, 2008 10:35 AM ET:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/world/middleeast/20iraq.html?_r=1&ref=world&oref=slogin
And buried deep within the world section of the New York Times. I'm not a regular NYT basher, but this is a pathetic excuse for an article. They are obviously using a stinger who is sympathetic to Sadr's movement. The article begins with the usual nonsense about Sadr's organization showing restraint. Than they go on about minor incidences of abuse and the appearance of inappropriate treatment.
"There were reports of rough treatment and especially of arrests of eminent followers of Mr. Sadr. It was unclear whether the units making the arrests had warrants, as required under Iraqi law. If so, Mr. Sadr's followers said they would not protest the detentions."
Contrast the tone of this article with The Times of London article about the same event. The difference is The Times reporter is actually in Amarah with the Iraqi Army. That article may sound a bit triumphal to some, but that's what happens when and army takes over an important enemy held city without a shot fired.
This is one of the most important events of the entire war and all the NYT can do is run a pathetic little article propping up the dying corpse of the Mahdi army. Good choice there by the editorial staff. Way to keep on top of important events. I guess it would really burn the folks at the NYT to actually reports obvious victories for the Iraqi government as victories. I know how this goes. In about a week they'll begrudgingly drag up some analyst who confirms that the obvious victory was indeed genuine, but than they are reluctant to say this amounts to any real progress because of a litany of other problems faced by the Iraqi government.
SOUR GRAPES!
Posted by GM Earnest at June 20, 2008 11:33 AM ET:
Thank you Bill and LWJ for continuing to report on these developments. I'm no expert on military issues, but this news is very heartening.
When connected to your articles on Iran's clandestine operations in Iraq, this news is wonderful indeed! It does sound like the Iraqi Army is doing an excellent job. And kudos to the less glamorous U.S. training of Iraq's new military.
Regarding the editors at the NYT, it is nearly treason what they do. Maybe they should move their operations to Venezuela where they can soak up praise from henchmen and dictators. But then again, I doubt if the useful idiots at the Times would care for Caracas very much. Besides, life in New York is good. Freedom of the press, and fact-starved readers, still keep the old gray lady alive.
Posted by Dan R. at June 20, 2008 11:53 AM ET:
Neo, I saw that NY Times article too and it made my blood boil as well. Seems like the author bent over backwards at every opportunity to try and minimize the success of the IA. But at the same time, we should certainly expect that from the likes of the NY Times and the Washington Post. It doesn't change the facts on the ground, which are ...
1) The Iraqi government is in firm control of the country
2) Al-Qaeda and the Sadrists are beaten.