Teaching Hate and Violence: Problematic Passages from Saudi State Textbooks for the 2018–19 School Year

Editor’s Note: Below is the executive summary from a new report by David Andrew Weinberg, the Anti-Defamation League’s Washington Director for International Affairs. The full report can be read at the ADL’s website.

In 2006, Saudi Arabia received its first U.S. waiver from penalties under the International Religious Freedom Act. This was due in part to the kingdom’s explicit commitment to revise its textbooks to eliminate all incitement, removing “remaining intolerant references that disparage Muslims or non-Muslims or that promote hatred toward other religions or other religious groups.” According to the U.S. government, Riyadh stated that this process was “scheduled to be completed in time for the start of the 2008 school year.”

A decade has passed since that deadline expired, and today ADL is disappointed to report that intolerant language of all kinds still abounds in Saudi Arabia’s government-published textbooks for schoolchildren. The incitement is particularly egregious at the high school level.

This is at odds with a September 2018 statement by the Saudi foreign minister that incitement in Saudi textbooks is not “still continuing” because the curriculum has been completely “revamped” numerous times. He contended that any allegations about incitement in the books are merely an outdated “legacy issue” raised by ill-informed critics of the kingdom. It is also at odds with assurances Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Education made in October 2017 to U.S. officials in which he stated his intent to fully revise all textbooks by the 2018–19 school year.

This report demonstrates that the new Saudi state textbooks for the 2018–19 academic year still contain passages that encourage bigotry or violence against numerous categories of people, including Jews, Christians, Shiite or Sufi Muslims, women, people who engage in anal sex, and anyone who mocks or converts away from Islam. Derogatory language against “infidels” — which is used in this context to refer to non-Muslims such as Christians and Jews — remains especially pervasive.

Eliminating the incitement from Saudi state textbooks is particularly important given the leadership role of the kingdom as custodian of the two holiest sites in Islam. Because of this special status, and thanks of the kingdom’s considerable oil wealth, the kingdom’s textbooks have been exported to a broad swath of countries on nearly every continent.

While many of the passages highlighted in this report have their roots in religious teachings, very few are direct quotes from the Quran. Even in those instances, particular references to such teachings can be removed from textbooks, replaced or paired with more tolerant quotations from other authoritative sources, or interpreted or contextualized differently while still respecting Islam.

Such changes would no doubt be unpopular with some religious extremists, but the Saudi monarchy is nonetheless capable of implementing these reforms.

This report is organized according to the different categories of incitement in current Saudi textbooks. There are separate sections for problematic passages pertaining to Jews, Christians, “infidels” as a broader category, Shiite or Sufi Muslims, women, people who engage in anal sex, and apostasy or perceived acts of sorcery.

All passages cited in this report are from Saudi state textbooks for the 2018–19 academic year. This report confirms that virtually all of the most problematic passages identified in recent studies remain in the 2018–19 curriculum.

To help address this issue, ADL endorses the bipartisan Saudi Educational Transparency and Reform Act in the U.S. House of Representatives. It calls upon Members of Congress to cosponsor this much-needed legislation and for Congressional leaders to help ensure that it comes up for a vote.

David Andrew Weinberg is the Anti-Defamation League’s Washington Director for International Affairs.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

Tags: ,


  • Nick Mastrovito says:

    We need to review our alliance with KSA.

  • Ken says:

    General statements. Not an hard examples. I’d like to see several examples of text.

  • LWJ Reader says:

    I wonder if pagans are liked in Saudi Arabia.

  • John says:

    Glad to see that many eyes are opening today in evilness of the saudis in spreading of the jihadi culture around the world. And what is surprising and very disappointing is that corrupted and greedy politicians in Washington, both démocrate and republicans continue to strive for good relations with the evil and deadly regime of the saudis, teaching to kill us citizens, news, Christians and all those who do not worship their prophet. The last case being the Kashoggi affaire where the saudis once again showed their Despite of human life to see a Donald Trump beating a drum to hide “his friends” saudis beastiality. What a shame. See how greediness is leading politicians in the USA.

  • Guest says:

    Why is this a surprise at all? Wherever Saudi has flown into “educational” institutions this is the outcome. Watch out for future jihads in certain states of India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Philippines, not to mention Pakistan, Myanmar, China, UK, Belgium, Germany and a host of other countries the resident Muslims from where attend seminaries funded by the Saudis or who work in Saudi Arabia. I can’t believe the local governments allowed this to happen all the while, waiting for it to become a problem.

    Can’t believe kids 15 years of age are taught about anal sex – how perverse can these lot get?

  • Vladimir says:

    Can we nuke them yet?


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram