Analysis: Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces in Iran’s game plan

As Iraqi Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) have been closing in on Tal Afar, a town 33 miles west of Mosul, through the western Mosul axis, the organization’s top commanders have openly discussed their post-Islamic State plans to secure the border with Syria and push into the country. These senior militia commanders are closely affiliated and coordinated with Iran.

The spokesman of Iranian-backed Harakat al Nujaba vowed on Nov. 18 that the PMF, as “one of Iraq’s security institutions,” was ready to pursue the Islamic State into Syria per the request of the Syrian government and the approval of the Iraqi government and parliament.

“It makes no difference whether we fight terrorism inside Iraq’s soil or outside of it,” the spokesman said. An offshoot of Asaib Ahl al Haq, Harakat al Nujaba was formed under Iranian supervision to fight in the Syrian civil war on the side of the Assad regime and already has forces deployed to Aleppo.

On Nov. 16, Iranian-backed Badr Organization leader Hadi al Ameri told the press in Baghdad that Damascus had requested the PMF to deploy to Syria following the expulsion of the Islamic State from Iraq, and that the PMF would establish security by the border area, according to statements carried in Al Waght. Iraq’s Prime Minister Hayder al Abadi echoed Ameri on border security on the same day, and had announced to the media earlier that Baghdad and Damascus were coordinated for exerting border control. Abadi, however, did not immediately comment on deployment to Syria.

The PMF is a 120,000-strong army with at least 80,000 fighting under the banners of Iranian-backed militias. It is a valuable pool of manpower and recruits for Iranian-led operations. The PMF’s planned moves to establish presence by the border with Syria and shift into the war there reflect important components of Tehran’s long-term strategies in Iraq and Syria.

There are discussions in Western policy circles about Iran’s game plan to build a land corridor from Iraq to Lebanon with its proxies, anchoring Iranian-backed forces in the region. Tehran, however, already exercises freedom of movement to the Mediterranean via its air bridge to Syria and has moved materiel and manpower to the Levant with impressive results despite sanctions and through two wars in the Middle East’s heartland. Iran has prevented Bashar al Assad’s fall and has turned around the civil war in Syria. Tehran has stockpiled more than 100,000 rockets in Lebanon. Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders have been bragging about extending their sphere of influence to the Mediterranean for the past three years.

The hypothesized Iranian land corridor. Credit: The Guardian

The hypothesized Iranian land corridor. Credit: The Guardian

Re-establishing a viable land corridor through Syrian territory would carry significant costs. During the early phases of the war, Iran used supply routes from Baghdad to Damascus before oppositions forces interdicted all routes by the fall of 2012, as discussed by Will Fulton, formerly of the American Enterprise Institute. Turkish regular forces and Turkish-backed rebels are expanding in northern Syria as part of Operation Euphrates Shield, threatening any supply line that runs through territory of Iran-aligned Syrian Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) to northern Aleppo. Hostile opposition groups control territory in the northern countryside, firmly holding Idlib, and around Damascus. The Islamic State extends between eastern and western Syria. Although the PMF has left the option of pushing into eastern Syria on the table, and Akram al Kabi, head of Harakat al Nujaba, has gone as far as calling for marching into the Islamic State’s stronghold of Raqqa, the Iraqi militias would face difficult challenges advancing through and consolidating non-Shiite territory, especially without reliable air support.

Tehran’s immediate priority in Syria is to achieve military victory in Aleppo. That would dim the opposition’s chances of taking urban territory and threatening regime positions. Iran has been instrumental in laying siege to the rebel-held part of the city. This operation, which would not have been possible without Russian intervention, has consumed significant Iranian and proxy blood and treasure in the past year. Victory in Aleppo is near, said Hashem al Heydari, the Hezbollah Brigades Secretary-General and PMF official, to an audience of Iranian Basij paramilitary in Bojnourd, Iran’s North Khorasan province, on Nov. 22. Concentrating resources on conquering the city and continuing gains in Damascus and Hama areas would contribute to stabilizing the regime, translating into leverage for future negotiations.

Even if negotiations are not fruitful, the pro-regime coalition could still win by eliminating the option of overthrow and consolidating control over “essential” Syria that stretches from Damascus to the Mediterranean. As long as Iran can find recruits, it can sustain its international proxy model to offset the bled-out Syrian army in a low-level conflict that does not pose existential threats to the Syrian regime.

The pro-regime coalition, however, is still vulnerable should a major foreign power decide to ally with Turkish forces, activate the southern front, and reinvigorate rebels in the north, as discussed in depth by Tony Badran in The Cipher Brief. Tehran is aware of its vulnerabilities in Syria; the Iranian leadership is strategically risk-averse and would not jeopardize hard-fought gains for the glory of territorial conquest and establishing a land corridor.

In Iraq, the PMF seeks to cement itself as a fabric of the state. The Iraqi Prime Minister’s order this past year to establish the PMF as an independent military institution in an effort to exercise more control already legitimizes their continued existence beyond the 2014 mandate based on the fatwa of Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani to drive the Islamic State from Iraq. That threat is pressing as long as the group controls Raqqa and has a presence in Iraq. Unless Iraq can train between 50,000 – 100,000 troops, which it does not appear to have the will nor means to effectively do so, the PMF can make a strong case that its mandate is unfulfilled and that it fills security voids, pushing back against calls from certain quarters for dissolution and disarming.

The PMF’s mentors, the IRGC in Iran and Hezbollah in Lebanon, have reinterpreted their respective raison d’etre of guarding the revolution and resisting Israel – both entities have transformed over the course of decades into dominant military institutions with political, economic, and cultural influence. The PMF has similar aspirations to ascend in Iraq, and its key leaders who are beholden to Iran see themselves as part of the “Axis of Resistance” led by the Islamic Republic.

[Update: Prime Minister Hayder al Abadi spoke on the same day as Hadi al Ameri. The earlier version of this report stated that he had spoken a day earlier.]

Amir Toumaj is a independent analyst and contributor to FDD's Long War Journal.

Are you a dedicated reader of FDD's Long War Journal? Has our research benefitted you or your team over the years? Support our independent reporting and analysis today by considering a one-time or monthly donation. Thanks for reading! You can make a tax-deductible donation here.

1 Comment

  • tuffsnotenuff says:

    This is all very well. It stops short of identifying winners and losers.

    First big winner is the Kurds. They are part of this alignment. Effectively they get to rule northern Iraq and Eastern Syria. And why not? They are one helluva lot more stable than the alternatives. Their oil can go east using the Iranian pipelines — black gold rules.

    The big winner here is Israel. That is not to say Netanyahu with his alliance with the Sa’ud clan and Qatar, Bahrain and the rest. This new alignment includes a very large population of Sunni Arabs, but the governments of Lebanon and Syria have to come out secular and pro-business. Israel and Jordan become resources that this new alignment will compete to attract, a competition that the GCC countries will observe on their business pages with great envy.

    Rebuilding Syria is complicated by the Jihadi thugs selling off Syrian manufacturing machinery, electrical power resources and the like in Turkey over years. Rebuilding is complicated by hundreds of problems. The Syrians know how to organize businesses so they’ll work it out.

    Turkey will also benefit. Again, not with Erdogan. But 20 years from now, or 50, a unified and peaceful region to Turkey’s south will contribute to a “Europeanization” of the local cultures, including their armies.

    One issue is what gets taught in the mosques — banning Imams from Arabia is one step toward modernization. Enough with the death cults, cutting girls, teaching altered versions of the Quran, teaching that it’s OK to murder Shia/Christians/Jews/Buddhists/ancient tribes. Bombing Shia pilgrims is their signature atrocity. This area was fully Ottoman with Kanun Law for centuries and that’s where it belongs. The Ottoman system is mainstream Islam everywhere except with the Arabian Bedouin Imams and the bandit hoards/terrorist psychopaths they seek out and support.

    Iran ??? Anybody see hundreds of Shia clerics out in the world recruiting terrorists? Even one? Anywhere?


Islamic state



Al shabaab

Boko Haram