« Islamic State goes from 'junior varsity' to all pro in 8 months, Admiral Kirby says | Main | UN reticent about 'armed group' holding 43 Golan Heights peacekeepers »




Jaamat-ul-Ahrar is 'separate from the TTP leadership,' spokesman says



Ihsanullah Ihsan, the former spokesman of the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan (Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan or TTP), confirmed in an email to The Long War Journal that the newly formed Jaamat-ul-Ahrar TTP is "separate from the TTP leadership."

"Jamaat-ul-Ahrar has become separate from the TTP leadership," Ihsan told LWJ. "TTP Jaamat-ul-Ahrar deals with itself and does not take orders from TTP leadership."

The formation of Jamaat-ul-Ahrar, followed by Ihsan's confirmation that the group is a separate entity from the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan, is the final nail in the coffin for the latter.

The Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan will likely continue in some form; but without the Mohmand and Kurram factions, and the Mehsuds in North and South Waziristan, it is a rump organization. Jamaat-ul-Ahrar can serve as a nucleus for Taliban factions that wish to continue the fight against the Pakistani government.

The Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan made a major mistake by appointing Mullah Fazlullah as the group's emir after Hakeemullah Mehsud's death in a US drone strike last year. Fazlullah, despite having served as Hakeemullah's deputy, was disconnected from the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan's traditional power base and appears to have been widely disliked.

If Jamaat-ul-Ahrar does emerge as the successor to the Movement of the Taliban in Pakistan, the group will likely be just as dangerous if not moreso than its predecessor. With Omar Khalid al Khorasani in the top leadership cadre, Jamaat-ul-Ahrar is sure to continue a relentless campaign of attacks against the Pakistani state and will continue to ally with groups such as al Qaeda.



READER COMMENTS: "Jaamat-ul-Ahrar is 'separate from the TTP leadership,' spokesman says"

COMMENTS POLICY (Please Read)

The comments section is intended to provide a forum to discuss and debate current posts. The Long War Journal makes no warranty to the accuracy of readers' comments, nor do we condone or affirm the opinions of reader-based comments. Discuss the issue at hand and do not go off topic. The comments section is not a place for partisan debates. Please be courteous to your fellow commenters. Personal attacks on the editors, authors, or readers of The Long War Journal sites will not be permitted. Please refer to current and former elected officials and public leaders respectfully. Offensive language, cursing (including replacing letters with characters), racial or ethnic slurs, and sexist remarks will not be tolerated. In the interest of keeping the comments section readable, please post a link to any articles, and excerpt the portions of the article that make your points. Any comments with the full article will be edited.

Commenters will be required to leave an e-mail address and are encouraged to submit their website or URL also. E-mail addresses will not be published to the site; however, if it is determined that it is a false address, the comment will be removed.

The Long War Journal reserves the right to edit, delete, or decline to publish any comments that violate this policy, and prevent any repeat offender from commenting.

If you have any questions on the comments policy or problems with the site, email Bill Roggio.

Post a Comment