Support The Long War Journal
Support The Long War Journal


Dear Long War Journal readers: A heartfelt thank you to all of you who helped us reach our fundraising goal of $25,000. Your generous donation will ensure we can continue our mission to report on the Long War. - Bill Roggio, Thomas Joscelyn, Lisa Lundquist, and the contributors.

« Did US drones strike in Pakistan yesterday? | Main | The Taliban on al Qaeda, 1996-97 »




US withdrawal plan from Afghanistan has not changed



On Wednesday, US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta announced that the US would end combat operations in Afghanistan in "mid to late 2013." The US forces would then switch to an advise and assist role, and the final withdrawal would occur by the end of 2014. CTV reported:

The United States and its NATO partners will end their combat roles in Afghanistan in 2013 -- a year earlier than previously announced.

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said that American troops will remain in the country through 2014, but only in a supporting role.

This switch to training and advising Afghan forces will occur in mid- to late-2013, Panetta told reporters in Brussels.

This announcement seems to have come as a surprise to many parties, Reuters noted:

Panetta surprised allies on Wednesday by suggesting the US combat mission in Afghanistan would end in 2013, the first time Washington had floated such a deadline.

Should it have surprised the US's allies? Was this really a change in plan?

No change in plan

Secretary Panetta's announcement corresponds to the same plan that US allies and the Karzai Government in Afghanistan agreed to over a year ago.

In September 2010, former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced that the US would conduct combat operations in Afghanistan for only "two or three more years" before transitioning to an advise and assist role, the Wall Street Journal reported:

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he envisions two or three more years of combat operations in Afghanistan before the U.S. transitions to an advisory role, a mission likely to last years more.

Pulling out combat forces in three years would ensure that the allied presence has transitioned to a training mission by the time British troops are due to withdraw in 2015. It would also meet Afghan President Hamid Karzai's goal of having his own army take responsibility for security by 2014.

At the NATO summit in Lisbon in November 2010, NATO and Afghan President Karzai agreed to the withdrawal date of the end of 2014.

The members met with President of Afghanistan Hamid Karzai regarding the group's operations in the country. They agreed to gradually withdraw combat forces from the country with a completion date of 2014.

In other words, Gates announced more than a year ago that the US would end combat operations sometime between late 2012 and late 2013. This is consistent with Panetta's announcement that combat operations would end in "mid to late 2013."

Gates also said back in September 2010 that the US would follow the same withdrawal schedule as it did in Iraq, the Wall Street Journal reported at the time:

Mr. Gates sketched a process much like that in Iraq, where the U.S. formally ended combat operations this week, rebranding its forces as advisory brigades.

This part also has not changed. For Iraq, the last US forces left in December 2011. However, the US had ended combat operations 16 months earlier, in August 2010, at which point US forces transitioned to an advise and assist role.

For Afghanistan, the US plans to leave by the end of 2014. Following the same schedule as in Iraq, the US should then end combat operations 16 months earlier, by August 2013, and transition to an advise and assist role. Again, this corresponds to Secretary Panetta's statement that combat operations would end in "mid to late 2013" and the US would transition to an advise and assist role.

To sum up, the timetable announced by Panetta on Wednesday does not deviate from that announced by Gates in September 2010 and adopted by NATO in the strategic agreement of November 2010.



READER COMMENTS: "US withdrawal plan from Afghanistan has not changed"

Posted by M. Muthuswamy at February 5, 2012 12:20 PM ET:

The role of “advise” and “assist” may not even happen through the presence of the U.S. advisors. For one thing, by all accounts, the Afghan-U.S. relations have been barely tolerable, if not acrimonious occasionally.

While some may claim that the Afghan government left by the U.S. needs America and vice versa, the diminished U.S. military may find itself vulnerable with a continued presence in Afghanistan beyond 2013. As in Iraq, the history may yet repeat itself.

That may be a good thing after all, for what have turned out to be strategically untenable long-term deployments.

Posted by Charu at February 10, 2012 10:51 PM ET:

Muthuswamy, you are absolutely right that this is Iraq redux. Without secure bases within Afghanistan we will be hard pressed to operate drones and to keep the Taliban from returning to Kabul. By throwing our lot with Karzai, who seems destined to swing from a lamp post like Najibullah, and not cultivating the Northern Alliance leadership, we have repeated all the mistakes made in Iraq. Substitute the Northern Alliance with the Kurds, Karzai's Pastuns with the Iraqii Shiites, and Pakistan with Iran, and down we go into the same rabbit hole with the same predictable consequences.