(42)Recent Operations on the Euphrates
Created by Steve Schippert, Marvin Hutchens and Bill Roggio
The following presentation details the current operations being conducted along the Euphrates River which began on October 1, and are still ongoing. The purposes of the operations are threefold: drive al Qaeda, the most dangerous and violent element of the insurgency from the region; establish the security conditions to allow elections on the constitution [October 15] and the parliament [December 15]; and establish a permanent presence of Iraqi Army and police forces.
The current operations must be looked at in the context of the Anbar Campaign, which began in November of 2004 when U.S. and Iraqi forces executed Operation Dawn in Fallujah. Fallujah was al Qaeda's easternmost headquarters, a safe haven where thousands of terrorists and their insurgent allies operated freely and directed attacks towards the heart of Iraq. Over one thousand terrorists and insurgents were killed and fifteen hundred were captured. Operation Dawn ejected the insurgency from Fallujah, but it was only the beginning of the Anbar Campaign. Operation River Blitz followed in February, which focused on establishing a presence in the city of Ramadi.
Iron Fist in Sadah, River Gate in Haditha, Haqlaniyah and Barwana, and Mountaineers in Ramadi, were preceded by several important operations which established the environment for their successful execution. Multiple search and destroy missions were executed along the river to keep the enemy off balance, such as Matador, Spear and Quick Strike (see the Anbar Campaign for a full listing of major operations).
Hunter was the overarching operation to push Iraqi and Coalition troops westward to secure the river cities and towns. The city of Hit was secured in Operation Sword on July 9. Rawah followed shortly after on July 18. The northern ratline in the Tal Afar-Mosul region was shut down during Operation Restoring Rights in early August, as was the northern crossing at Rabiah and the southern crossing in Ruthbah [Operation Cyclone]. Khan Al Baghdadi was secured on September 23. The river region was essentially segmented, with Coalition bases being set up for the prepositioning of troops and material for future operations. During this time, Coalition forces struck al Qaeda targets of opportunity, using airpower and ground forces in raids along the length of the river.
The Iraqi Security Forces have taken an increasingly larger role as operations progressed over the summer. They have a strong presence in Fallujah and Habbaniyah, and are beginning to appear in battalion strength in the Euphrates cities of Ramadi, Hit, Haditha and Rawah. In Tal Afar, the Iraqi Army took the lead and outnumbered U.S. troops three to two.
Iron Fist, which began on October 1 and ended October 7, was directed at the town of Sadah near Qaim. Over seventy five terrorists and insurgents were killed in combat. Over 1,000 Marines, soldiers and Navy personnel were involved in the operation. Coalition forces have established multiple outposts in the area surrounding Sa'dah, which will work to interdict the flow of support to al Qaeda and the insurgents.
River Gate began on October 3 and is still ongoing. River Gate is focused on the cities of Haditha, Haqlaniyah and Barwana. Over 2,500 Coalition forces are involved, including 2,500 Marines and soldiers, 350 Iraqi Army and police forces. River Gate is the largest operation on the Euphrates River since Matador this spring. Seven enemy have been killed and over two hundred captured since the operation began.
Mountaineers also began on October 4, and was a single day cordon and search operation made up of 500 U.S. Marines and 400 Iraqi Army troops. Twelve insurgent were captured and a key bridge was seized to prevent the movement of insurgents and munitions into the city.
The seizure and destruction of bridges across the Euphrates is a crucial part of ongoing operations. Of twelve bridges that cross the river between Qaim and Ramadi, eight have been destroyed and the remaining four have been placed under the control of the Coalition. The Coalition now controls the flow of traffic from the border to Baghdad, and from north to south of the river, making the insurgent's movement of men and material all the more difficult and dangerous.
READER COMMENTS: "Recent Operations on the Euphrates"
Posted by Super 6 at October 10, 2005 2:17 PM ET:
Excellent reporting and perspective (as usual). Thanks Bill......
Posted by Justin Capone at October 10, 2005 2:25 PM ET:
Great Job Bill
Any idea when we will be seeing battalion strength operations by the Iraqi Army west of Haditha?
Posted by Bill Roggio at October 10, 2005 2:32 PM ET:
Thanks.
RE: Iraqi battalions west of Haditha. Just not enough information to make an educated guess. I think when we see a large presence in Haditha, we'll know they are ready to move westward.
Posted by cjr at October 10, 2005 3:10 PM ET:
"1 battalion of the 48th NG brigade will be sent(in Oct or Nov) near the Syrian border and will be responsible for a specific piece of terrain."
From an Atlanta newspaper in September, but I cant find the link now..
Posted by cjr at October 10, 2005 3:13 PM ET:
Ahh found the link.
http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/guard/entries/2005/09/22/48th_will_range.html
See 6th paragraph
Posted by Sgt. York at October 10, 2005 3:43 PM ET:
Re: "...destruction of bridges across the Euphrates..."
You only destroy bridges when you can't secure them. Other then the GreenZone and a few FOBs, the US Military controls nothing in Iraq. When the dust settles, a bunch of puritanical fundamentalist Islamists will be running that country and every guy who got his legs blown off fighting this stupid war will realize that those politicians and you political pundits don't give a damn.
============
Posted by GK at October 10, 2005 4:17 PM ET:
Looks like that ridiculous fool Jimmy Carter is off praising Liberia for having an election. Liberia is a country where as recently as last year, political opponents would routinely kill each other and eat the body parts.
How much do you wanna bet that Jimmy Carter will NEVER find the time to praise Iraq's or Afghanistan's success at Democracy?
America lost 4 years of her life under this person....
Posted by ghoullio at October 10, 2005 5:07 PM ET:
Sgt York, when has a US Soldier EVER faught or died for a politician? do they scream "4 MORE YEARS" as their battle cry?
but i agree, the US Army does NOT control squat in Iraq. that distinction belongs to the Iraqi people, the Iraqi Army, and the Iraqi Police...we arent there to run their country for them, we are there to remove Hussein and the Ba'athist element and provide security while the Iraqi alliance decides on a representative government.
Posted by Mixed Humor at October 10, 2005 6:34 PM ET:
Bill, Marvin and Steve...good presentation, thanks for the insight.
MH
Posted by antimedia at October 10, 2005 6:45 PM ET:
"Sgt York" writes, "You only destroy bridges when you can't secure them." Military strategy expert are you?
Perhaps you should read before coming to conclusions.
"Of twelve bridges that cross the river between Qaim and Ramadi, eight have been destroyed and the remaining four have been placed under the control of the Coalition. The Coalition now controls the flow of traffic from the border to Baghdad, and from north to south of the river, making the insurgent's movement of men and material all the more difficult and dangerous."
Get it? By destroying SOME of the bridges, they force the enemy to move where they WANT them to move. It's called thinking ahead. It's called controlling the battle space.
Posted by PeterArgus at October 10, 2005 7:28 PM ET:
I think Sgt York was just trying to give us a sneak preview of the new Disney movie "Chicken Little".
Nice job Bill and Co.
Posted by john k at October 10, 2005 9:35 PM ET:
Your blog has been outstanding. My Marine son's unit is in the Haditha area. Thank you from all in our family for giving us some context for the activity in Anbar province. Saw this casualty report on Defense Link: Lance Cpl. Shayne M. Cabino, 19, of Canton, Mass., died Oct. 6 from an improvised explosive device while conducting combat operations against enemy forces near Al Karmah, Iraq. Is Al Karmah in Anbar province?
Posted by Bill Roggio at October 10, 2005 9:51 PM ET:
Hello john k,
The thanks goes to your son. Please give him our best. This Al Karmah is located near Fallujah in Anbar province.
Posted by Mixed Humor at October 10, 2005 10:24 PM ET:
Al Karmah is about 12 miles northeast of Fallujah, and about 20 miles northwest of Baghdad. Let me see if I can attach a link to the map.
Map
Posted by Mixed Humor at October 10, 2005 10:27 PM ET:
After looking at the map, it looks like it may be a few miles further than my above comment states, but nonetheless, the map link works.
Posted by Andrew Reeves at October 10, 2005 11:00 PM ET:
I've got two worries about the follow up. In the first place, garrisoning these towns may still be a problem. After all, there was an Iraqi police force in Haditha for a while until it was chased out by insurgents in this most recent summer. Our guys and the Iraqis on our side have to keep playing offense or there'll be a repeat of these towns gradually slipping back into insurgent control.
My other big worry is that there are going to be too many Iraqi units pushed into combat before they're ready. While there are a lot of Iraqi units that are good (the units in Fallujah come to mind), there are still a lot that are as of yet made up of unmotivated shitbirds. If you go pushing the latter into combat, there's a real danger that you're going to have desertions that lead you if not back to square one than at least several steps back with respect to the units employed.
Still, if there is an Iraqi army and police force capable of garrisoning Anbar, Salah ad Din, Ninawah, and the suburbs south of Baghdad, then there's a chance of coming out of this thing if not with a win, then at least with a non-loss (there's too a high level of shady activity in the south by factions that seem to answer only to Tehran going on for us to be entirely pleased with the outcome that we get).
Posted by Alicia Taylor at October 10, 2005 11:09 PM ET:
Any idea how long much longer operation river gate will go on? Usual operations last about 5-10 days. How about this one?
Posted by Soldier's Dad at October 10, 2005 11:26 PM ET:
Justin,
"Iraqi Army West of Haditha"
The ISF is as far west as Rawah.(oct 5 MNFI press briefing slides). I would expect an increase in ISF in Ramadi before an expansion of ISF into the AlQaim area.
Posted by hamidreza at October 11, 2005 3:06 AM ET:
When the U.S. military invaded in 2003, busloads of Iraqi exiles -- and some Jordanians -- drove into Iraq from Jordan to join the defense. As the anti-U.S. insurgency grew, Jordanian newspapers called it "al-Muqawama al-Sharifah" -- the honorable resistance.
But such phrases are vanishing from news reports, and some see disillusionment setting in, including in Salt, another Jordanian city that, like Zarqa, has sent fighters to Iraq.
"At first the propaganda worked on a few young men here," shopkeeper Mohamed Dabbas, 28, said over coffee at a Salt cafe. "But after the losses in Iraq, and the stories about what was going on there, they're not so ready to die."
The stories of endless carnage -- of innocent Iraqi civilians killed by Zarqawi's bombers -- have repelled many Arabs.
"Saddam Hussein, bin Laden, Zarqawi and whoever thinks like them have set back the Muslim nation 2,000 years!" complained Mohamed Arabiyat, 50, a relative of one young man from Salt who died in the Iraq conflict.
A leading regional scholar believes most young Arabs willing to die in Iraq are already there. "I don't think the reserves of the extremist Islamist groups are very strong any more," said Mohamed el-Sayed Said of Egypt. But others believe Sunni-Shiite bloodletting, an Iraq conflict between Islam's rival branches, may awaken old hatreds and replenish the ranks.
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-tajikistan-blast,0,796197.story?coll=sns-ap-world-headlines
Posted by hamidreza at October 11, 2005 3:08 AM ET:
corrected link for above post
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/wire/sns-ap-iraq-the-foreign-connection,0,6763267.story?coll=sns-ap-world-headlines
Posted by ItalianGuy at October 11, 2005 3:22 AM ET:
Thanks for this report and for your site.
There is one thing that I really don't understand. The bridges' destruction. It was impossible to conquer them and then make these bridges a sort of attraction pole or important checkpoint? I think that with coalition firepower an heli assault could be considered. Or insurgency is so well armed to make an heli assult too risky?
To rebuild a bridge is vary expensive and its destruction make life for civilian and reconstruction of herats and minds much harder...
Posted by Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 3:37 AM ET:
ItalianGuy,
"There is one thing that I really don't understand. The bridges' destruction. It was impossible to conquer them"
The problem is that the so called terrorists run everytime someone shows up to fight them. Cutting the bridges limits the options of where they can run to a group of soldiers guarding the remaining bridges.
Fixing the bridges will be cheaper than building an Army outpost at every bridge.
Posted by Jeremy's mom at October 11, 2005 5:27 AM ET:
Thank you for keeping me up to date. There is nothing in the news, they only report on non essential things in order to downplay the war on terror. My son is in Haditha, got a call Sat and was glad to hear his voice. He said to watch the news and this is the best I've found.
Posted by Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 5:34 AM ET:
Jeremy's Mom,
Bill's site is the best there is.
Posted by JackassFestival at October 11, 2005 5:47 AM ET:
Regarding the bridges, I read somewhere (probably Strategy Page) that they are using a type of bomb that does minimal damage to the bridge to make it impassible, but cheaper to repair. I think the bomp just puts a hole thru it so that a car can't use it, but you have to walk across it.
Could be wrong.
Posted by leaddog2 at October 11, 2005 6:26 AM ET:
"(there's too a high level of shady activity in the south by factions that seem to answer only to Tehran going on for us to be entirely pleased with the outcome that we get)".
Andrew, you are correct, BUT one country at a time, please! One at a time! We will have to do something about Iran's mullahs, but Syria is a more immediate problem.
Posted by Bill Roggio at October 11, 2005 6:30 AM ET:
The bombs they are using are filled with concrete (I discussed this briefly here at the beginning of September). You are correct, it renders the bridge impassable but does not destroy the foundation. It should be noted that the need to repair the bridges makes a VERY good incentive for the locals to turn in al Qaeda and convince the domestic inusrgents to put down their arms. hamidreza mentioned the import of the bridges for local commerce a while back, and he a correct.
Jeremy's mom,
We need to thank you and your son. What I do here is easy. What our men and women are doing in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere is hard.
Posted by dlw at October 11, 2005 6:49 AM ET:
Hey Bill,
Great Site, I've been lurking for a long time.
Two questions. The first is about those inert bombs. If the bridge is made impassable to cars, does that mean that it is still walkable? Isn't that a bad thing? We don't want the terrorists using these bridges to walk their suicide bombers across either, do we?
Second, I'm concerned about what happens to all these "captured" terrorists. From reading Michael Yon, it seems that alot of the home grown terrorists are released after capture. Do we have an idea as to what percentage are really being held long term and what percentage are being put right back out on the street to attack our men again?
thanks again and please, keep the information coming.
Posted by Janice at October 11, 2005 7:02 AM ET:
Maybe you know the answer to this, or someone else who reads this blog. What happens to all these terrorists that are captured by coalition forces? I have read in other blogs (i.e., Major K) that they are often released. If so, are they just being "recycled" to do their dirty work another day?
Posted by JarheadDad at October 11, 2005 7:03 AM ET:
Hey john k, along with LCpl Cabino we lost PFC Jason Frye, Cpl Nick Cherava, and LCpl Patrick Kenny. 2/2 Marines and in my son's Plt. We also lost three WIA. All friends and all fine young men. Warlords Always - Marines Forever!
MH gave you a great look at it. Karmah is 18 miles NE of Camp Fallujah.
2/2 is working with 1-4-1 IA in that Karmah AO. And doing a bang up job too! That entire IA Bn is strong and well trained. It is one of six at that level that I know of. But you won't hear that anywhere unless you dig deep on the internet!
Jeremy's Mom, I am soooo jealous! heh! We haven't heard from Da Grunt in a month. He is an HQ Marine that went back outside the wire four weeks ago. Third deployment. They are tasked with making sure the elections can be held the same as all our military right now. Maybe after the 15th we'll get to hear from him again. They'll definitely be due a break for sure!
Posted by exhelodrvr at October 11, 2005 7:53 AM ET:
Jarhead Dad and Jeremy's Mom,
Thanks so much for the service your sons are providing all of us.
Posted by Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 8:02 AM ET:
Detainee Procedures - Recycling
Some detainees are released shortly after interrogation. "Suspicion" is reason enough to be detained. Many are released after initial interrogation, just like policeman might release a suspect after initial investigation.(Running away from a crime scene could be an indication of guilt, or that you jog past that location everyday)
The detainees are then transferred up the process, where their files are reviewed again. Similar to criminal matters all over the world, there may be a determination of insufficient evidence, and the detainee may be released.
After a few months go by, the files are reviewed again for a determination to Prosecute, Release with Bond, Release or continued detention.
It is a legal process, and at some point, it favors the defendent.
Posted by desert rat at October 11, 2005 8:58 AM ET:
LTC Kurilla of the 4/2 in Mosul was shot last month by a "recycled" Insurgent. The Iraqi theater is treated more like a crime scene than a war zone.
My thanks to the other fathers of deployed troops. My own young Marine returned from Iraq last Spring. He's to short to return to Iraq and so is off to Okinowa for a second time.
The Iraqis will be more than capable of securing Iraq for their Government. The Iranian border traffic will flow BOTH ways. Freedom's call is louder and more powerful then the Iranian Mullah's siren song. They have more to fear from cross border traffic than Iraqi civil society.
Posted by Ike at October 11, 2005 10:13 AM ET:
CBS is taking comments and questions TODAY ONLY about their reporting on Iraq. Please guys let take the time to ask them about the things we ask about on here all the time.
Here is the link http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/publiceye/main500486.shtml
and the email to send the questions to is publiceye@cbs.com
Please let him know how we feel. This is their Iraq correspondent.
Posted by Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 10:35 AM ET:
Ike,
Couldn't manage to register with CBS.
I have a question for them.
Why would I turn to a network that employs Mike(Yes I would let US Soldiers walk into an ambush for the story) Wallace and Yes our camera man in Mosul was actually a terrorist killing American Soldier's for news about anything?
Posted by Dave From Chicago at October 11, 2005 10:48 AM ET:
Hey guys, I just read an AP article at http://news.yahoo.com/fc/World/Iraq
and it seemed to suggest mostly US forces would be guarding polling places. Didn't Iraqi forces do it last time? Does anyone have any information on the plan and what soldiers will be used? thanks!
Posted by Soldier's Dad at October 11, 2005 10:51 AM ET:
Dave,
I read the article to say US Forces will be protecting the ballots. In any case, it is the UN's call.
Posted by Dave From Chicago at October 11, 2005 10:55 AM ET:
Oops, yeah you're right. I should of read it closer. So I'm guessing US soldiers will be near the polling stations but out of site and the Iraqi's will do the searches at the polling places
Posted by Ike at October 11, 2005 12:37 PM ET:
Thanks to all who are posting on the CBS thing.
Posted by Sgt. York at October 11, 2005 1:28 PM ET:
Iraq Unveils Security Measures for Vote
BAGHDAD, Iraq - Iraq announced a curfew, weapons ban, border closings and other security measures Saturday to clamp down ahead of next weekend's key constitutional referendum and prevent insurgent attacks. Sunni Arabs geared up their campaign to defeat the measure at the polls.
Read more
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051008/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq
=============
Posted by Enigma at October 11, 2005 4:11 PM ET:
Iraqis Reach Deal on the Constitution
Posted by john k at October 11, 2005 6:24 PM ET:
Jarheaddad. We are sorry for your loss. These men are doing a great work that could change the middle east for generations to come. During the fighting, I have come to rely on Fourth Rail for truth. Our son called this AM, back in camp, first contact in 10 days. "I am fine, saw action, and what you see on the news is totally different than we see here. The people whose house was used for a sniper post served them tea on the roof. The terrorists are few and hard to find. When we do, with local intelligence, they are dead or captured. Send wipes, dried fruits, ziplock bags all sizes" In quotes, but rough paraphrase.