(1)Operation River Gate Update - Day Two
Day two of Operation River Gate, which is aimed at dislodging al Qaeda and insurgents from the towns of Haditha, Haqlaniyah and Barwana, has ended. Six al Qaeda have been reported killed, and over 110 suspected insurgents detained. Iraqi Soldiers secured Haditha General Hospital, which was used as a base of operations by terrorists last spring during Coalition search and destroy operations. Three IEDs were discovered and disabled.
In an effort to contain the terrorists on the southern banks of the Euphrates, the Coalition has severed the bridges across the Euphrates (marked on the map).
Operation River Gate began yesterday with predawn air strikes on the Dulab, Haditha and Barwana bridges which span the Euphrates River. The strikes were carefully executed to disable the bridges and limit the insurgents' ability to flee the cities.
The denial of bridges is an important piece of the Coalition strategy to deny freedom of movement to al Qaeda and the insurgency. The tactic of destroying bridges has been used in western Iraq. The Coalition is carefully funneling all traffic north and south of the river through Rawah, where it maintains a strong presence. Wretchard outlined the strategic significance of Rawah - it sits along the boundary of the steppe and desert to the west, where travel is not restricted to the roads, and riverene Iraq to the east, where roads are vital as a line of communications. Rawah has become the river gate of the Euphrates - those wishing to travel north, south, east or west of the river must now pass through Rawah.
Captain Jeffrey Pool admonishes the media for poor reporting on River Gate, much of which can be seen in littered throughout the news (this Washington Post story is a good example):
I have noticed some misreporting, especially concerning air strikes. The only bombs dropped by Coalition aircraft were those against the three bridges. There has also been no Coalition artillery used in Op River Gate. Reports of Iraqi and US Forces destroying homes and buildings in Haditha, Haqlaniyah and Barwana are false. Essential services such as electricity, water and access to medical care have not been disrupted by the ongoing operation.
READER COMMENTS: "Operation River Gate Update - Day Two"
Posted by Annoy Mouse at October 5, 2005 12:46 PM ET:
The WaPo article that was gleaned from Iraqi stringers, special correspondents Bassam Sebti and Saad Sarhan, does seem a little colored, but aside from saying flames illuminated the skies they clearly state that the targets were the bridges.
"Flames from U.S. air strikes illuminated the skylines of the three cities just before dawn on Tuesday, according to the Associated Press. Bridges across the Euphrates River between Haqlaniyah and Haditha were bombed to prevent insurgents from using them, the wire service reported."
---
War is hell and apparently you may not have time to don your top hat and cane, or your head scarf for that matter.
""The Marines did not give us any time to allow the women to put on the hajib [head scarf] and go out with proper clothes," he said. "They broke into the house like Holako," he said, referring to a famous Mongolian barbarian who invaded the Arab homeland and burned Baghdad centuries ago."
---
The bad guys were just there but you missed him. Never mind the evidence trail linking them to certain safe houses.
"Mohammed Hadithi, the head of the Iraqi Red Crescent Society in Haditha, charged the U.S. troops violated the rights of residents during the assault. The Marines "neglected the humanitarian standards," he said. "If the American people come and see the army they are proud of doing that to unarmed women and children, they would have disowned the army because those they are looking for have escaped hours before they came and attacked.""
The Iraqi's are adept at trying to use guilt to influence MNF operations. Are Americans and Westerners in general the only societies that can fold up on the basis of spurious accusations? How prevalent is guilt used in Arab societies as a whole. What a bunch of guilt mongering hog wash. I should disown the army because the "those they are looking for" (you mean terrorists?) have escaped. Doesn't mean that they didn't leave caches of weapons behind. It more likely means they did leave caches behind and that is at least one reason to perform cordon and search operations.