A Not-so-grand Strategy
Al Qaeda in Iraq and Zarqawi now appears to recognize the futility of conducting military operations alone to achieve victory in Iraq. The SITE Institute reports the recently released publication of Zarqawi's magazine, Thurwat al-Sinam, discusses grand strategy, which extends beyond pure combat operations.
This issue is the first edition of the publication to explicitly reference military strategy, delineating five sectors or "fields" of jihad: military, security and intelligence, medical, information, and economic. Throughout the issue, the authors reiterate that if the mujahideen focus only on military operations, regardless of their successes in battle, they will lose the jihad on other fronts. They provide examples such as Afghanistan and Bosnia wherein an alleged military victory by the mujahideen was overturned in the eyes of the international community because the mujahideen neglected other sectors of warfare. Of particular interest as a non-military based threat to the mujahideen is the creation of a "peaceful Islam" which has "nothing to do with the original religion" and is spread by "information media all over the earth" in the hopes that "the infidels will succeed in this which they could not do militarily".
The dilemma for al Qaeda is that it is an overwhelmingly military organization, whose finances are specifically set up to support military operations, weapons acquisitions, training, recruitment and infrastructure. There is very little energy devote to the softer aspects of grand strategy - wining the hearts and minds in the areas of economics [jobs, business, education, etc.] and humanitarian care. Al Qaeda cannot match the West's superiority in these areas. And even if they tried, their ideological makeup makes the prospects success unlikely. The rejection of al Qaeda by local Iraqis sympathetic to their cause makes this clear.
The only advantage al Qaeda has in the fight is the skepticism of the media towards the American application of power. Yet Zarqawi has expressed his displeasure towards 'friendly' media in the past, and in a recent communiqué expresses his frustration over the control of information. Despite al Qaeda's best efforts at conditioning the Sunnis in believing the Americans should be fought and driven from Iraq, they fear efforts to court the Sunnis.
"The evidence and proof of their incompetence are all their attempts to conceal and alter the facts using the crusader media. Our intelligence has informed us about several scheming crusader plots aimed at extinguishing the torch of jihad. Among those plots are:"1.) Contacting secular Sunnis, socialists, and collaborating factions and convincing them that in order to get their freedom that the Sunnis should participate in elections and writing the constitution."2.) An attempt to separate Al-Qaida's Committee from the national [resistance] by distorting the reputation of the mujahideen in the eyes of the Muslims in an effort to portray them as criminals among the people of the Sunnah and Jamaah."
3.) The obvious media blackout over the operations from the last few days and the endless attempts to distort daily events and to spread misinformation about the endless alleged arrests of commanders and assistants.
Points 1 and 2 demonstrate al Qaeda recognizes the dangers in allowing factions of the Sunni insurgency to participate with the Iraqi government. Zarqawi seems to have given up hope in turning the tide of the Iraqi people, and focusing his energy on maintaining the viability of the various insurgent factions.
Point 3 is odd, as terrorist attacks are the main story from Iraq. Zarqawi doesn't elaborate so it is difficult to discern his disappointment over the "media blackout". Zarqawi has mocked the coalition for supposedly overvaluing the capture of his lieutenants, but it is difficult to argue with success.
Despite al Qaeda's best efforts to control the message, and sympathies in certain media corners, particularly in the Arab media, Zarqawi is giving signals that he is not in control. And for good reason. The enthusiasm of the recent election, the low opinion of the insurgency in Iraq (and a particularly low opinion of al Qaeda), the willingness of Muslims to enlist to fight in the security services, the relatively low numbers of foreign fighters entering Iraq, the progress being made in creating a constitution and a host of other political and economic successes (all documented by Arthur Chrenkoff) show al Qaeda is not appealing to the masses of the Muslim.
This is what happens when your grand strategy is predicated only on terrorism, religious fanaticism and oppressive rule.

READER COMMENTS: "A Not-so-grand Strategy"
Posted by Soldier's Dad at July 19, 2005 2:53 PM ET:
"3.) The obvious media blackout over the operations from the last few days"
Suicide bombings with zero injuries don't get a lot of press
Stryker soldiers fend off suicide attacks during border town fight
Posted by USMC_Vet at July 19, 2005 4:53 PM ET:
This is interesting:
This plays directly into a discussion I am currently in the middle of with a commenter (Here) who, in her protestation over 'torture' at Gitmo and Abu Ghraib, seemingly refuses to acknowledge that the kind gentlemen in detention at Guantanamo Bay and elsewhere are Islamic militants who subscribe to the WIF's 1998 declaration of Jihad against Crusaders and Jews.
Apparently lost on her is that these kind gentlemen merely find her useful at the moment, as good students of Lesson 18 are apt to be. Hopefully she will see (and this quote above should serve to assist) that, were she ever truly successful in her appeasement towards them and her opposition to the War on Terror, her usefulness will have run its course.
Thanks for pointing to Thurwat al-Sinam today, Bill. Might just come in handy.
Insofar as the above quote is concerned, AQ/Zarqawi will find success (in the West) only to the degree to which the Western media and political circles further their claims in this regard. It seems at time that the same referenced media and political circles are in fact ahead of Zarqawi to that end.
If you ask me, it seems we (the infidel West) are left to fight a battle for Islamic ideology that is more appropriately waged by moderate Muslims worldwide. But that is a much longer discussion than a comment section allows.
Posted by A reader at July 19, 2005 11:01 PM ET:
Paraphrasing Zarkawi's rantzine:
Ah-HA!!! NOW I get it! When Islamic supremacists seethe about a crusade to destroy Islam they don't mean the troops and tanks and AC-130s. On the contrary! It's those Bush speeches calling Islam a "religion of peace." They think it's all a disinfo plot to mislead people about the true nature of their beloved religion of totalitarian violence.
What a hoot!
Posted by vucommodore at July 20, 2005 9:39 AM ET:
Zarqawi's magazine? LOL. So he has time for Jihad and writing a magazine at the same time? Must be a really talented guy.
Seriosuly, how does anybody know for sure who actually wrote this?
Posted by Soldier's Dad at July 20, 2005 10:13 AM ET:
"Point 3 is odd, as terrorist attacks are the main story from Iraq. Zarqawi doesn't elaborate so it is difficult to discern his disappointment over the "media blackout"."
There is, at least in Al Queda's eyes, a fairly substantial battle that has been raging in Rawa since saturday. As far as I can tell, no major news media outside of Army times is reporting it.
It would appear that the Stryker Brigades have enlarged their AOR as far South as the Euphrates River.
http://www.armytimes.com/story.php?f=1-292925-983444.php
Posted by Bill Roggio at July 20, 2005 11:39 AM ET:
Soldier's Dad,
My readers are always a step ahead of me. See today's post....